[1]朱艳,韩长志.普通核桃与深纹核桃中叶绿体基因组密码子使用特征对比[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(08):1507-1520.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.08.015]
 ZHU Yan,HAN Changzhi.Comparison of codon usage characteristics of chloroplast genomes in Juglans regia and Juglans sigillata[J].,2024,(08):1507-1520.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.08.015]
点击复制

普通核桃与深纹核桃中叶绿体基因组密码子使用特征对比()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年08期
页码:
1507-1520
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2024-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of codon usage characteristics of chloroplast genomes in Juglans regia and Juglans sigillata
作者:
朱艳韩长志
(西南林业大学林学院/云南省森林灾害预警与控制重点实验室,云南昆明650224)
Author(s):
ZHU YanHAN Changzhi
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University/Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650224, China)
关键词:
普通核桃深纹核桃叶绿体基因组同义密码子偏好性
Keywords:
Juglans regiaJuglans sigillatachloroplastgenomesynonymous codonbias
分类号:
S664.1
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.08.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
本研究旨在对比分析普通核桃与深纹核桃中叶绿体基因组密码子的使用偏好性,对普通核桃与深纹核桃中各53条蛋白质编码区序列开展预测分析,明确上述2种核桃叶绿体基因组中的最优密码子,为未来开展核桃物种的亲缘关系研究提供理论依据。利用Codon W 1.4.2和在线软件CUSP等分析普通核桃与深纹核桃中的叶绿体基因组密码子,获得相对同义密码子使用度(RSCU)、有效密码子数(ENC)、G+C含量等参数,再进行中性绘图分析、有效密码子数分析及奇偶偏好性分析。普通核桃与深纹核桃中叶绿体基因组的密码子适应指数均为0.167,ENC均在45.00以上,表明密码子偏好性弱。普通核桃与深纹核桃中叶绿体基因组密码子的G+C含量整体表现为:基因中所有密码子第1位碱基G+C的含量(GC1)>基因中所有密码子第2位碱基G+C的含量(GC2)>基因中所有密码子第3位碱基G+C的含量(GC3)。进一步分析发现,第3位碱基的使用频率表现为T大于A,G大于C。从普通核桃中筛选出14个最优密码子,从深纹核桃中筛选出17个最优密码子,其中共有23个最优密码子在第3个位置偏好以A/U结尾。总之,普通核桃和深纹核桃中叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性主要受到自然选择的影响,本研究结果可以为进一步探索核桃抗性遗传基因的改良和表达提供理论基础和数据支撑。
Abstract:
The aim of the study was to compare and analyze the usage preference of chloroplast genome codons in Juglans regia and Juglans sigillata, and to predict and analyze 53 protein coding sequences (CDS) in Juglans regia and Juglans sigillata, so as to clarify the optimal codons in the chloroplast genomes of the above two walnuts and provide a theoretical basis for the future research of the genetic relationship of walnut species. Codon W 1.4.2 and online software CUSP were used to analyze the chloroplast genome codons in Juglans regia and Juglans sigillata, and the relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU), effective number of codons (ENC), G+C content and other parameters were obtained. Neutrality plot analysis, effective number of codons analysis (ENC-plot), and parity preference analysis (PR2-plot) were performed. The codon adaptation index of chloroplast genomes in Juglans regia and Juglans sigillata was 0.167, and the ENC was above 45.00, indicating that the codon preference was weak. The G+C content of chloroplast genome codons in Juglans regia and Juglans sigillata was as follows: the content of G+C at the first base of all codons in the gene (GC1)>the content of G+C at the second base of all codons in the gene (GC2)>the content of G+C at the third base of all codons in the gene (GC3). Further analysis showed that the usage frequency of the third base was T>A, G>C. A total of 14 optimal codons were screened in Juglans regia, and 17 optimal codons were screened in Juglans sigillata. Among them, 23 optimal codons preferred the A/U end at the third position. In conclusion, the codon preference of chloroplast genome in Juglans regia and Juglans sigillata is mainly affected by natural selection, which provides theoretical basis and data support for further exploration of the improvement and expression of walnut resistance genes.

参考文献/References:

[1]NOVOA E M, PAVON-ETERNOD M, PAN T, et al. A role for tRNA modifications in genome structure and codon usage[J]. Cell,2012,149(1):202-213.
[2]赵春丽,彭丽云,王晓,等. 苋菜AtGAI基因密码子偏好性与进化分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2019,24(12):10-22.
[3]辛雅萱,黎若竹,李鑫,等. 杧果叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏好性分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2021,41(9):148-156,165.

[4]胡桂兵,张上隆,徐昌杰,等. 不同种类柑橘的密码子用法分析[J]. 华南农业大学学报,2006,27(1):13-16.
[5]HERSHBERG R, PETROV D A. Selection on codon bias[J]. Annual Review of Genetics,2008,42:287-299.
[6]刘慧敏,乌云塔娜,杜红岩. 杜仲转录组基因密码子使用偏好性分析[J]. 北方园艺,2016(13):85-89.
[7]XU C, CAI X N, CHEN Q Z, et al. Factors affecting synonymous codon usage bias in chloroplast genome of Oncidium Gower Ramsey[J]. Evolutionary Bioinformatics,2011,7:271-278.
[8]王茹,罗永坚,刘相泉,等. 水杉叶绿体基因组同义密码子使用偏好性[J]. 湖北民族大学学报(自然科学版),2022,40(2):121-128.
[9]SINGH N D, DAVIS J C, PETROV D A. X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis[J]. Genetics,2005,171(1):145-155.
[10]PARVATHY S T, UDAYASURIYAN V, BHADANA V. Codon usage bias[J]. Molecular Biology Reports, 2022,49(1):539-565.
[11]SHAW J, LICKEY E B, SCHILLING E E, et al. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms:the tortoise and the hare Ⅲ[J]. American Journal of Botany,2007,94(3):275-288.
[12]李西文,胡志刚,林小涵,等. 基于454FLX高通量技术的厚朴叶绿体全基因组测序及应用研究[J]. 药学学报,2012,47(1):124-130.
[13]冯展,江媛,郑燕,等. 肉苁蓉属植物叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 中草药,2023,54(5):1540-1550.
[14]谭淳月,刘勇,赖章凤,等. 茶树氧甲基转移酶基因密码子偏好性分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2023,45(3):652-662.
[15]沈莲文,田金红,王玉昌,等. 2种玉兰属植物叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2023,43(2):44-53.
[16]原晓龙,刘音,康洪梅,等. 蒜头果叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2021,41(3):15-22.
[17]夏晞,彭劲谕,王大玮,等. 3种榕属叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 西北林学院学报,2022,37(5):88-94.
[18]舒军霞,杨林,周涛,等. 刺柏属4种药用植物叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 中草药,2022,53(23):7507-7515.
[19]孟佳,方晓璞,史宣明,等. 我国核桃产业发展现状、问题与建议[J]. 中国油脂,2023,48(1):84-86,103.
[20]郭从善. 核桃及其加工与利用[J]. 粮油食品科技,1999(5):23-25.
[21]祝友朋,韩长志,熊智. 核桃细菌性黑斑病菌分泌蛋白质的理化性质及特征分析[J]. 江苏农业学报,2019,35(2):295-301.
[22]谢蕾,李贤忠,宁德鲁,等. 深纹核桃种质资源评价与挖掘研究进展[J]. 林业科技通讯,2021(11):26-31.
[23]覃阳,全绍文,周丽,等. 基于转录组测序的核桃(Juglans regia L.)SSR标记开发[J]. 分子植物育种,2019,17(20):6736-6742.
[24]余务刚,肖良俊,吴涛,等. 不同类型深纹核桃的表型多样性研究[J]. 西部林业科学,2022,51(6):31-38,78.
[25]NOVEMBRE J A. Accounting for background nucleotide composition when measuring codon usage bias[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution,2002,19(8):1390-1394.
[26]陆奇丰,骆文华,黄至欢. 两种梧桐叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏性分析[J]. 广西植物,2020,40(2):173-183.
[27]SUEOKA N. Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1988,85(8):2653-2657.
[28]YANG X, LUO X N, CAI X P. Analysis of codon usage pattern in Taenia saginata based on a transcriptome dataset[J]. Parasit Vectors,2014,7:527.
[29]SUEOKA N. Near homogeneity of PR2-bias fingerprints in the human genome and their implications in phylogenetic analyses[J]. Journal of Molecular Evolution,2001,53(4/5):469-476.
[30]唐晓芬,陈莉,马玉韬. 密码子使用偏性量化方法研究综述[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学,2013,32(5):660-666.
[31]SHARP P M, LI W H. The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias,and its potential applications[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1987,15(3):1281-1295.
[32]韩利红,代冬琴,赵明玉,等. 双孢蘑菇基因组密码子的偏好性分析[J]. 菌物学报,2021,40(3):603-615.
[33]余涛,蒲芬,管芹,等. 南欧大戟叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(15):35-41.
[34]ROMERO H, ZAVALA A, MUSTO H. Codon usage in Chlamydia trachomatis is the result of strand-specific mutational biases and a complex pattern of selective forces[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,2000,28(10):2084-2090.
[35]吴学俊,梁湘兰,易子群,等. 湖北山楂叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2023,21(8):2508-2516.
[36]冯德江,蔡华雅,刘翔,等. 马铃薯X病毒外壳蛋白的表达水平与变偶密码子使用频率的相关性[J]. 微生物学报,2003,43(5):569-576.
[37]原晓龙,李云琴,张劲峰,等. 降香黄檀叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 广西植物,2021,41(4):622-630.
[38]杨秀瑶,张梦洁,尹拓,等. 蒲桃属叶绿体基因组特征及密码子偏好性分析[J]. 西南农业学报,2023,36(9):1869-1880.
[39]万露露,范敦锦,王中煊,等. 杜鹃叶绿体基因组特征及密码子偏好性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(13):54-59.

[40]季凯凯,宋希强,陈春国,等. 木兰科叶绿体基因组的密码子使用特征分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2020,22(11):52-62.

[41]傅建敏,索玉静,刘慧敏,等. 柿属植物叶绿体蛋白质编码基因密码子用法[J]. 经济林研究,2017,35(2):38-44.

[42]刘兴跃,何仲坚,邱毅敏. 四种蔷薇科果树叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2022,20(16):5299-5308.

[43]喻凤,韩明. 紫花苜蓿叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 广西植物,2021,41(12):2069-2076.

[44]赵森,邓力华,陈芬. 秋茄叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏好性分析[J]. 森林与环境学报,2020,40(5):534-541.

[45]梁娥,齐敏杰,丁延庆,等. 竹节参转录组使用密码子偏好性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2019,47(2):59-63.

[46]李显煌,杨生超,辛雅萱,等. 灯盏花叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2021,36(3):384-392.

[47]王婧,王天翼,王罗云,等. 沙枣叶绿体全基因组序列及其使用密码子偏性分析[J]. 西北植物学报,2019,39(9):1559-1572.

相似文献/References:

[1]张超宇,王应彪,颜旭,等.基于改进ShuffleNet V2网络的核桃破壳物料壳仁分类识别方法[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(04):1015.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.011]
 ZHANG Chao-yu,WANG Ying-biao,YAN Xu,et al.Classification and recognition method of walnut shell and kernel based on improved ShuffleNet V2[J].,2023,(08):1015.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-09-06基金项目:云南省研究生导师团队建设项目(2022100);云南省“兴滇英才支持计划”青年人才专项(YNWR-QNBJ-2020-188)作者简介:朱艳(2000-),女,云南昭通人,硕士研究生,主要从事森林保护相关研究。(E-mail)508034093@qq.com通讯作者:韩长志,(E-mail)swfuhcz@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-18