[1]杜光辉,张琳,丁丽,等.紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田配合氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮素营养平衡的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(06):1012-1019.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.06.007]
 DU Guanghui,ZHANG Lin,DING Li,et al.Effects of co-incorporation of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw with nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield and nitrogen nutrition balance[J].,2024,(06):1012-1019.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.06.007]
点击复制

紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田配合氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮素营养平衡的影响()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年06期
页码:
1012-1019
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2024-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of co-incorporation of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw with nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield and nitrogen nutrition balance
作者:
杜光辉1张琳1丁丽1聂良鹏1史鹏飞1吕玉虎1张丽霞1潘兹亮1孙全东2
(1.信阳市农业科学院,河南信阳464001;2.信阳市农业农村局,河南信阳464001)
Author(s):
DU Guanghui1ZHANG Lin1DING Li1NIE Liangpeng1SHI Pengfei1LYU Yuhu1ZHANG Lixia1PAN Ziliang1SUN Quandong2
(1.Xinyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinyang 464001, China;2.Xinyang Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Xinyang 464001, China)
关键词:
紫云英水稻秸秆产量氮积累氮素表观盈亏量
Keywords:
Chinese milk vetchrice strawyieldnitrogen accumulationapparent profit and loss of nitrogen
分类号:
S511
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.06.007
摘要:
紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田是减肥增效的重要举措,通过试验研究紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田配合氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮素营养平衡的影响,以期为豫南稻区合理利用紫云英与水稻秸秆提供理论依据。氮肥设计按照常规施用量的60%氮(N0.6)、100%氮(N)2个水平;水稻秸秆采取留高茬还田(St)、不还田2种方式;绿肥采取种植并翻压紫云英(Mv,22 500 kg/hm2)、冬闲2种模式;以冬闲和水稻秸秆不还田不施肥作空白对照(CK),共10个处理,研究紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田配合氮肥减施对水稻产量、水稻地上部氮积累量、土壤氮含量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素表观盈亏量的影响。结果表明,紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田配施60%氮肥(MvStN0.6)的水稻产量较冬闲田水稻秸秆不还田100%氮肥(N)、紫云英或水稻秸秆还田配施等量氮肥处理(MvN0.6、StN0.6)分别显著增加4.77%、6.49%、23.48%。紫云英还田处理的水稻地上部氮积累量均显著高于其他等量氮肥处理。与冬闲田水稻秸秆不还田100%氮肥处理相比,紫云英还田配施100%氮肥处理显著增加水稻土碱解氮含量,减氮处理中仅MvStN0.6处理显著增加了土壤全氮含量。紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田配施氮肥处理较冬闲田水稻秸秆不还田配施等量氮肥的氮肥表观利用率均显著提高,MvStN0.6处理较N0.6处理显著增加了氮肥实际利用率。不同处理土壤氮素表观盈亏量差异较大,为-67~69 kg/hm2。综合来看,紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田配施60%氮肥可有效增加水稻地上部氮的积累,提高水稻的收获指数和氮肥实际利用率,进而增加水稻产量,降低氮肥面源污染。
Abstract:
The combined returning of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw is an important measure to reduce fertilizer and increase efficiency. The effects of combined application of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw with nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield and nitrogen nutrition balance were studied to provide theoretical basis for rational utilization of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw in the south of Henan province. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied at two levels of 60% nitrogen (N0.6) and 100% nitrogen (N). Rice straw was returned to the field with high stubble (St) and not returned to the field. Two modes of green manure were adopted: planting and rolling Chinese milk vetch (Mv, 22 500 kg/hm2) and winter fallow. The treatment of winter fallow, no straw returning and no fertilization was used as a blank control (CK). In this study, a total of 10 treatments were used to study the effects of co-incorporation of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw with nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield, rice aboveground nitrogen accumulation, soil nitrogen content, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen apparent profit and loss. The results showed that the rice yield in the treatment of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw combined with 60% nitrogen fertilizer (MvStN0.6) was significantly increased by 4.77%, 6.49% and 23.48%, respectively, compared with that in the treatments of winter fallow + rice straw not returning + 100% nitrogen fertilizer (N), Chinese milk vetch or rice straw returning with the same amount of nitrogen fertilizer (MvN0.6, StN0.6). The aboveground nitrogen accumulation of rice in Chinese milk vetch returning treatments was significantly higher than that in other equal nitrogen fertilizer treatments. Compared with the treatment of winter fallow + rice straw not returning + 100% nitrogen fertilizer, the treatment of Chinese milk vetch returning + 100% nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased the content of alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen in paddy soil. In the nitrogen reduction treatments, only the MvStN0.6 treatment significantly increased the soil total nitrogen content. The apparent nitrogen use efficiency in the treatment of co-incorporation of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw with nitrogen fertilizer was significantly higher than that in the treatment of winter fallow + rice straw not returning + equal nitrogen fertilizer, and the actual nitrogen use efficiency in MvStN0.6 treatment was significantly higher than that in N0.6 treatment. The apparent profit and loss of soil nitrogen under different treatments varied greatly, ranging from -67 kg/hm2 to 69 kg/hm2. In summary, the co-incorporation of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw with 60% nitrogen fertilizer can effectively increase the accumulation of nitrogen in the aboveground part of rice, improve the harvest index of rice and the actual utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer, thereby increasing rice yield and reducing nitrogen fertilizer non-point source pollution.

参考文献/References:

[1]黄晶,刘立生,马常宝,等. 近30年中国稻区氮素平衡及氮肥偏生产力的时空变化[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(6):987-998.
[2]宋大平,陈巍,高彦征. 淮河流域氮肥农药施用的合理性及其环境影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2011,30(6):1144-1151.
[3]ANNA P, EDWARD W. Effects of catch crops cultivated for green manure and mineral nitrogen fertilization on soil enzyme activities and chemical properties[J]. Geoderma,2012,189-190.
[4]高嵩涓,周国朋,曹卫东. 南方稻田紫云英作冬绿肥的增产节肥效应与机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(12):2115-2126.
[5]胡中泽,衣政伟,王安,等. 紫云英不同时期还田部分替代化肥对氨挥发及水稻产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2021,37(5):1160-1166.
[6]GAO S J, ZHOU G P, CHANG D N, et al. Southern China can produce more high-quality rice with less N by green manuring[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling,2023,196:107025.
[7]李忠义,唐红琴,韦彩会,等. 乡村振兴战略下绿肥产业持续发展的SWOT分析与路径研究——以广西壮族自治区为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(7):165-174.
[8]季诗域,王旭东,石思博,等. 稻秆还田与化肥配施对稻茬麦田土壤肥力和小麦产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2020,36(5):1181-1188.
[9]王吕,崔月贞,吴玉红,等. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报,2022,48(4):952-961.
[10]ANSARI M A, CHOUDHURY B U, LAYEK J, et al. Green manuring and crop residue management:effect on soil organic carbon stock,aggregation,and system productivity in the foothills of Eastern Himalaya (India)[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2022,218:105318.
[11]鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:44-49.
[12]林多胡,顾荣申. 中国紫云英[M]. 福州:福建科学技术出版社,2008:46-51,69-84.
[13]CHEN X P, CUI Z L, FAN M S, et al. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs[J]. Nature,2014,514:486-490.
[14]周影,王琳,魏启舜,等. 稻茬高度影响轮作紫云英生长及还田效应[J]. 土壤,2021,53(5):977-982.
[15]黄璐,李廷亮,李顺,等. 旱地冬小麦夏闲期种植不同豆科绿肥对还田养分和土壤有机碳、氮组分的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2022,41(12):2335-2343.
[16]万水霞,唐杉,蒋光月,等. 紫云英与化肥配施对土壤微生物特征和作物产量的影响[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(6):109-117.
[17]LIANG H, LI S, ZHANG, et al. Long-term green manuring enhances crop N uptake and reduces N losses in rice production system[J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2022,220:105369.
[18]程会丹,鲁艳红,聂军,等. 土壤活性氮动态变化及氮素可利用性对紫云英翻压量的响应[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(3):448-456.
[19]麦逸辰,卜容燕,韩上,等. 添加不同外源氮对水稻秸秆腐解和养分释放的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2021,37(22):210-219.
[20]朱强,张静,郭再华,等. 稻草和紫云英联合还田下施氮水平对水稻产量及土壤氮素形态的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(12):2177-2183.
[21]王飞,王利民,何春梅,等. 紫云英与有机物料连续还田在黄泥田水稻稳产提质增效中的作用[J]. 土壤,2022,54(3):455-463.
[22]杨璐. 紫云英种植及与稻草协同利用的减肥效应和紫云英固氮调控机制[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2019.
[23]曹娜,熊强强,陈小荣,等. 不同施氮量对晚稻抵御抽穗扬花期低温的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(8):2566-2574.
[24]周国朋,谢志坚,曹卫东,等. 稻草高茬-紫云英联合还田改善土壤肥力提高作物产量[J]. 农业工程学报,2017,33(23):157-163.
[25]李成伟,龚松玲,曹培,等. 不同季节生态型水稻植株干物质积累及产量的比较[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(5):96-101.
[26]王慧,张琳,常单娜,等. 豫南紫云英水稻轮作区减施不同比例氮肥对水稻养分吸收和转运的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(7):1194-1207.
[27]杨滨娟,黄国勤,徐宁,等. 秸秆还田配施不同比例化肥对晚稻产量及土壤养分的影响[J]. 生态学报,2014,34(13):3779-3787.
[28]邓中华,明日,李小坤,等. 不同密度和氮肥用量对水稻产量、构成因子及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 土壤,2015,47(1):20-25.
[29]马艳芹,钱晨晨,邓丽萍,等. 紫云英配施氮肥对双季稻产量、干物质量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 核农学报,2017,31(12):2399-2407.
[30]李国齐,吴汉. 免耕与秸秆还田对直播稻产量及水分利用的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2022,40(9):945-951.
[31]陈苏春,胡静博,肖梦华,等. 农村生活再生水灌溉调控对稻田养分的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2022,40(4):411-418.
[32]ZHOU G P, CAO W D, BAI J S, et al. Non-additive responses of soil C and N to rice straw and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth L.) mixtures in a paddy soil[J]. Plant and soil,2019,436(1/2):229-244.
[33]ZHOU C H, ZHAO Z K, PAN X H, et al. Integration of growing milk vetch in winter and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application can improve rice yield in double-rice cropping system[J]. Rice Science,2016,23(3):132-143.
[34]MBUTHIA L W, ACOSTA-MARTNEZ V, DEBRUYN J, et al. Long term tillage,cover crop,and fertilization effects on microbial community structure,activity:implications for soil quality[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2015,89:24-34.
[35]张玉铭,孙宏勇,李红军,等. 环渤海低平原农田生态系统养分循环与平衡研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(8):1035-1048.
[36]FAN Q Y, XU C X, ZHANG L, et al. Application of milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) with reduced chemical fertilizer improves rice yield and nitrogen,phosphorus,and potassium use efficiency in southern China[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2023,144:126762.
[37]张济世,张琳,丁丽,等. 紫云英还田与化肥减量配施对土壤氮素供应和水稻生长的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(10):1793-1803.

相似文献/References:

[1]付广青,杜静,叶小梅,等.青贮水稻秸秆厌氧发酵产沼气特性[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(01):90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.014 ]
 FU Guang-qing,DU Jing,YE Xiao-mei,et al.Characterization of biogas production by anaerobic digestion of ensiled rice straw[J].,2016,(06):90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.014 ]
[2]欧阳家风,刘峙嵘,邹翔.水稻秸秆在土壤-水体系中的腐解性能[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(03):546.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.010]
 OUYANG Jia-feng,LIU Zhi-rong,ZOU Xiang.Decomposition property of rice straw in soil solution[J].,2018,(06):546.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.010]
[3]马贤武,王凯,刘轩,等.揉搓与稀碱联合预处理对水稻秸秆酶解产糖率及结构的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1294.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.013]
 MA Xian-wu,WANG Kai,LIU Xuan,et al.Study on the effects of rubbing-alkali pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis reducing sugar yield and structure of rice straw[J].,2018,(06):1294.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.013]
[4]季诗域,王旭东,石思博,等.稻秆还田与化肥配施对稻茬麦田土壤肥力和小麦产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(05):1181.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.015]
 JI Shi-yu,WANG Xu-dong,SHI Si-bo,et al.Effects of rice-straw returning to the field and fertilizer application on soil fertility and wheat yield in rice stubble wheat field[J].,2020,(06):1181.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.015]
[5]张中信,岳奇奇,钱申,等.外源氮添加对2种豆科牧草功能性状的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(05):1197.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.017]
 ZHANG Zhong-xin,YUE Qi-qi,QIAN Shen,et al.Effects of exogenous nitrogen addition on functional traits of two leguminous forage plants[J].,2020,(06):1197.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.017]
[6]胡中泽,衣政伟,王安,等.紫云英不同时期还田部分替代化肥对氨挥发及水稻产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(05):1160.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.010]
 HU Zhong-ze,YI Zheng-wei,WANG An,et al.Effects of different incorporation stages of Chinese milk vetch residue on ammonia volatilization loss and yield of rice[J].,2021,(06):1160.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.010]
[7]刘蓓一,韦青,田吉鹏,等.羊瘤胃液中产阿魏酸酯酶乳酸菌的筛选及对水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1306.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.018]
 LIU Bei-yi,WEI Qing,TIAN Ji-peng,et al.Screening of ferulic acid esterase-producing lactic acid bacteria from rumen fluid of sheep and their effects on silage quality of rice straw[J].,2022,38(06):1306.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-05-12基金项目:国家绿肥产业技术体系项目(CARS-22)作者简介:杜光辉(1992-),男,河南罗山人,硕士研究生,研究实习员,从事土壤肥料与绿肥研究。(E-mail) dugh1992@163.com通讯作者:吕玉虎,(E-mail)18736046075@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-15