[1]张泽旺,张军强,张永春,等.有机源调理剂对草莓品质和土壤理化性质、细菌群落结构的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(03):531-537.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.03.016]
　ZHANG Ze-wang,ZHANG Jun-qiang,ZHANG Yong-chun,et al.Effects of organic source conditioners on strawberry quality and soil physicochemical properties and bacterial community structure[J].,2024,(03):531-537.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.03.016]
点击复制

有机源调理剂对草莓品质和土壤理化性质、细菌群落结构的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年03期
页码:
531-537
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2024-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of organic source conditioners on strawberry quality and soil physicochemical properties and bacterial community structure
作者:
张泽旺1; 2; 张军强3; 张永春2; 马洪波2; 张辉2; 孙书慧4; 葛高飞1
(1.安徽农业大学资源与环境学院,安徽合肥230036；2.江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,江苏南京210014；3.恩施土家族苗族自治州农业农村局,湖北恩施445000；4.金陵科技学院,江苏南京210038)
Author(s):
ZHANG Ze-wang1; 2; ZHANG Jun-qiang3; ZHANG Yong-chun2; MA Hong-bo2; ZHANG Hui2; SUN Shu-hui4; GE Gao-fei1
(1.College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China;2.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;3.Agricultural and Rural Bureau of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, China;4.Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 210038, China)
关键词:
有机源调理剂; 土壤理化性质; 细菌群落结构; 草莓
Keywords:
organic source conditioners; soil physical and chemical properties; bacterial community structure; strawberry
分类号:
S531.06
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.03.016
摘要:
为提升土壤质量,减少化肥用量,改善草莓品质,本研究以草莓品种红颜为试验材料,采用大棚小区试验,设置常规施肥(CK)、有机源调理剂4 800 kg/hm2+常规施肥(T1)、有机源调理剂4 800 kg/hm2+基肥减量10% (T2)、有机源调理剂4 800 kg/hm2+基肥减量20%(T3)、有机源调理剂4 800 kg/hm2+基肥减量30%(T4)5个处理,分析有机源调理剂应用与化肥减量对草莓产量、品质、根腐病发病率以及土壤理化性质和土壤细菌群落结构的影响。结果表明,与常规施肥相比,T1处理能显著提高草莓产量、土壤有机质含量和pH值,增加变形菌门和拟杆菌门细菌相对丰度。施用有机源调理剂能显著降低根腐病发病率(39.68%～64.09%)。T1和T4处理能降低放线菌门相对丰度。土壤有效磷含量、速效钾含量、有机质含量是土壤细菌群落结构的主要影响因子。T1处理对提高草莓产量和改善土壤细菌群落结构效果较好,T4处理对提高土壤有机质含量、改善团聚体结构和缓解土壤酸化效果较好。
Abstract:
In order to improve the soil quality, reduce the amount of chemical fertilizer and improve the quality of strawberry, a plot experiment was carried out in greenhouse with Hongyan as the experimental material in this study. Five treatments were set up: conventional fertilization (CK), 4 800 kg/hm2 organic source conditioner + conventional fertilization (T1), 4 800 kg/hm2 organic source conditioner + base fertilizer reduction 10% (T2), 4 800 kg/hm2 organic source conditioner + base fertilizer reduction 20% (T3), 4 800 kg/hm2 organic source conditioner + base fertilizer reduction 30% (T4). The effects of organic source conditioner application and chemical fertilizer reduction on strawberry yield, quality, root rot incidence, soil physical and chemical properties and soil bacterial community structure were analyzed. The results showed that compared with conventional fertilization, T1 treatment could significantly increase strawberry yield, soil organic matter content and pH value, and increase the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. The application of organic source conditioner could significantly reduce the incidence of root rot (39.68%-64.09%). T1 and T4 treatments could reduce the relative abundance of Actinobacteria. Soil available phosphorus content, available potassium content and organic matter content were the main influencing factors of soil bacterial community structure. T1 treatment had a better effect on increasing strawberry yield and improving soil bacterial structure. T4 treatment had a better effect on increasing soil organic matter content, improving aggregate structure and alleviating soil acidification.

参考文献/References:

[1]李晓青,王晓云,张晓申,等. 草莓启动培养技术研究[J]. 农业科技通讯,2016(2):132-133.
[2]张奇瑞,刘小林,徐胜光,等. 外源茉莉酸甲酯对连作草莓土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报,2022，35(8):1764-1769.
[3]董华芳,饶家惠,许延波,等. 不同植物生长调节剂对红颜草莓园艺性状的影响[J]. 现代农业科技,2022(10):83-87.
[4]李亮杰,楚宗丽,张惠妹,等. 河南省草莓生产现状调查、经济效益分析及发展建议[J]. 中国果树,2022(7):91-96.
[5]陈廷钦. 土壤调理剂及应用进展[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,33(增刊1):338-342.
[6]杨尚东,李荣坦,谭宏伟,等. 长期单施化肥和有机无机配合条件下红壤蔗区土壤生物学性状及细菌多样性差异[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(4):1024-1030.
[7]赵慧渊. 实现化肥使用零增长的途径[J]. 农业技术与装备,2021(9):81-82.
[8]刘惠禹. 土壤调理剂“艾加1号”试验总结[J]. 吉林蔬菜,2015(5):34.
[9]程文娟,王建春,宋治文,等. 土壤调理剂应用效果研究[J]. 天津农林科技,2017(3):30-32.
[10]李智财. 绿色防控技术在玉米病虫害防治中的应用[J]. 南方农业,2021,15(27):15-16.
[11]孙蓟锋,王旭. 土壤调理剂的研究和应用进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2013(1):1-7.
[12]王勤俭,王峰,俞巧钢,等. 不同土壤调理剂对红黄壤黄桃园土壤及黄桃品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学,2022,63(8):1743-1747.
[13]谢仕祺,林正全,陈玉蓝,等. 不同土壤调理剂对植烟土壤养分及细菌群落的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报,2021,55(3):523-530.
[14]任志荣. 农药减量增产技术在玉米病虫害防治中的应用分析[J]. 农家参谋,2021(16):75-76.
[15]周丽,高进华,解学仕,等. 含腐植酸土壤调理剂对酸性土壤改良苹果产量及品质的影响[J]. 腐植酸,2022(4):47-51.
[16]熊思健,陈绍荣. 新型腐殖酸土壤调理剂的作用机理和应用研究[J]. 化肥工业,2014,41(3):53-57.
[17]李夏雯,卢树昌. 调理剂对旱直播稻土壤物理性状、氮素吸收与迁移的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(22):216-222.
[18]李迪秦,任铮,祝利,等. 土壤调理剂与枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂配施对烟草生长发育及病害的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(10):88-94.
[19]李丹,王道泽,赵玲玲,等. 不同土壤改良剂对设施蔬菜土壤酸化的改良效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2017,33(27):112-116.
[20]戴黎,杜延全,朱建强. 几种土壤调理剂改良大棚种植草莓土壤的效果[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2021(2):276-282.
[21]栗方亮,张青,王煌平,等. 土壤调理剂对蜜柚产量、品质及土壤性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2018,34(6):39-44.
[22]ZUO Y, ZHANG J, ZHAO R, et al. Application of vermicompost improves strawberry growth and quality through increased photosynthesis rate,free radical scavenging and soil enzymatic activity[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2018,233:132-140.
[23]高鑫,周军. 生物活性土壤调理剂对草莓土壤改良试验初报[J]. 农业科技通讯,2019(9):150-151,275.
[24]张丽萍,黄亚丽,程辉彩,等. 土壤微生物制剂防治草莓连作病害的研究[J]. 土壤,2007(4):604-607.
[25]张蕾,李萍,王维瑞,等. 轻度盐胁迫下土壤调理剂对设施黄瓜土壤肥力及生长发育的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2021(9):50-60.
[26]吴辰晨,吴健平,傅庆林. 土壤调理剂对雷笋产量及土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学,2022,63(8):1758-1760.
[27]刘晓月,张燕,李娟,等. 4 种土壤调理剂对稻田土壤pH 值及有效态 Cd 含量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学,2017(10):28-31.
[28]孙瑶,马金昭,傅国海,等. 土壤调理剂和生草互作对果园酸化土壤化学性质及产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2021(2):61-68.
[29]陈士更,张民,丁方军,等. 腐植酸土壤调理剂对酸化果园土壤理化性状及苹果产量和品质的影响[J]. 土壤,2019,51(1):83-89.
[30]CARAVACA F, MABOREKE H, KURTH F, et al. Synergists and antagonists in the rhizosphere modulate microbial communities and growth of Quercus robur L.[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2015,82:65-73.
[31]CHEN D L, WANG X X, ZHANG W, et al. Persistent organic fertilization reinforces soil-borne disease suppressiveness of rhizosphere bacterial community[J]. Plant and Soil,2020,452(1/2):313-328.
[32]靳晓拓,马继勇,周彦妤,等. 化肥减量配施有机肥下芒果园土壤细菌多样性及群落结构特征[J]. 热带作物学报,2019,40(6):1205-1212.
[33]王鹏,陈波,张华. 基于高通量测序的鄱阳湖典型湿地土壤细菌群落特征分析[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(5):1650-1658.
[34]于冰,宋阿琳,李冬初,等. 长期施用有机和无机肥对红壤微生物群落特征及功能的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2017(6):58-65.
[35]ZHANG G S, MA X J, NIU F J, et al. Diversity and distribution of alkaliphilic psychrotolerant bacteria in the Oinghai-Tibet Plateau permafrost region[J]. Extremophiles,2007,11(3):415-424.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐筋燕,何晓兰,邵明灿,等.不同连作年限栝楼根际土壤微生物群落多样性分析[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(05):1140.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.05.006]
　XU Jin-yan,HE Xiao-lan,SHAO Ming-can,et al.Analysis of microbial community diversity in rhizosphere soil of continuous cropping Trichosanthes kirilowii[J].,2023,(03):1140.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.05.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-12-01基金项目：江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(21)1009]；江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2021378)作者简介：张泽旺(1999-),男,安徽铜陵人,硕士研究生,主要从事农业生态研究。(E-mail)1721757514@qq.com通讯作者：葛高飞,(E-mail)gegaofei@ahau.edu.cn；马洪波,(E-mail)274579992@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-20