[1]张金辉,李银月,张发文,等.物料碳氮比及微生物菌剂接种量对黄瓜秧-鸡粪堆肥过程的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(02):260-269.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.02.008]
　ZHANG Jin-hui,LI Yin-yue,ZHANG Fa-wen,et al.Effects of carbon-nitrogen ratio of materials and inoculation amount of microbial inoculants on the composting process of cucumber seedlings-chicken manure[J].,2024,(02):260-269.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.02.008]
点击复制

物料碳氮比及微生物菌剂接种量对黄瓜秧-鸡粪堆肥过程的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
260-269
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2024-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of carbon-nitrogen ratio of materials and inoculation amount of microbial inoculants on the composting process of cucumber seedlings-chicken manure
作者:
张金辉1; 李银月1; 张发文1; 袁远1; 郭占玲2
(1.河南农业大学林学院,河南郑州450002；2.河南省农业科学院植物营养与资源环境研究所,河南郑州450002)
Author(s):
ZHANG Jin-hui1; LI Yin-yue1; ZHANG Fa-wen1; YUAN Yuan1; GUO Zhan-ling2
(1.College of Forestry of Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou 450002, China;2.Institute of Plant Nutrition, Agricultural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China)
关键词:
堆肥; 黄瓜秧; 鸡粪; 碳氮比; 微生物菌剂
Keywords:
compost; cucumber seedlings; chicken manure; carbon-nitrogen ratio; microbial agent
分类号:
S141.4
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.02.008
摘要:
为明确黄瓜秧与鸡粪堆肥的适宜碳氮比及微生物菌剂接种量,本研究设计3个碳氮比(17.5、22.5和27.5)和3个微生物菌剂接种量(0.1%、0.2%、0.3%)共9个处理,测定了不同处理对黄瓜秧与鸡粪好氧堆肥过程中温度、有机质降解率、pH值、种子发芽指数(GI)、养分含量及堆肥腐熟度的影响。结果表明,高碳氮比和高微生物菌剂接种量处理堆体温度更快达到50 ℃以上,且堆肥过程中高温的峰值高于中、低碳氮比和中、低微生物菌剂接种量处理；高碳氮比和高微生物菌剂接种量处理,有机质降解率、堆肥的腐熟度(T)都显著提高；但接种0.3%微生物菌剂处理对有效磷、速效钾的保留效果以及堆肥最终发芽指数(GI)的提升均不如接种量为0.2%与0.1%的处理。综合上述分析,黄瓜秧与鸡粪进行堆肥无害化生产时,适宜的碳氮比为27.5,微生物菌剂接种量为0.1%～0.2%。
Abstract:
In order to clarify the suitable carbon-nitrogen ratio and inoculation amount of microbial inoculants for cucumber seedlings and chicken manure composting, three carbon-nitrogen ratios (17.5, 22.5 and 27.5) and three microbial inoculation amounts (0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3%) were designed in this study. A total of nine treatments were used to determine the effects of different treatments on temperature, degradation rate of organic matter, pH value, seed germination index (GI), nutrient content and compost maturity during the aerobic composting of cucumber seedlings and chicken manure. The results showed that the pile temperature reached more than 50 ℃ faster under high carbon-nitrogen ratio and high inoculation amount of microbial inoculants, and the peak value of high temperature during composting was significantly higher than that of medium and low carbon-nitrogen ratio and medium and low inoculation amount of microbial inoculants. Under high carbon-nitrogen ratio and high inoculation amount of microbial inoculants, the degradation rate of organic matter and the maturity of compost (T) were significantly improved. However, under the treatment of 0.3% microbial agent inoculation, the retention effect of available phosphorus and available potassium and the increase of final germination index (GI) of composting were not as good as those of 0.2% and 0.1% inoculation. Based on the above analysis, the suitable carbon-nitrogen ratio was 27.5 and the inoculation amount of microbial agent was 0.1%-0.2% when cucumber seedlings and chicken manure were composted harmlessly.

参考文献/References:

[1]吴中勇,李延荣,董中丹. 我国蔬菜行业高质量发展探析[J]. 长江蔬菜,2023(20):80-82.
[2]钟佳芸. 畜禽粪便资源化技术研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2016.
[3]孙可欣,国冉冉,王子铭,等. 蔬菜废弃物资源化高效利用方式分析[J]. 中国农学通报,2023,39(5):92-99.
[4]黎运红. 畜禽粪便资源化利用潜力研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2015.
[5]MOORE P A, DANIEL T C, EDWARDS D R, et al. Effect of chemical and microbial amendments on ammonia volatilization from composting poultry litter[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2004,33(2):728-734.
[6]WONG J W C, BUNDELA P S, SELVAM A, et al. Evaluation of thermophilic fungal consortium for organic municipal solid waste composting[J]. Bioresource Technology,2014,168:214-221.
[7]王若斐,刘超,操一凡,等. 不同碳氮比猪粪堆肥及其产品肥效[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2017(6):127-134,154.
[8]张红玉. 碳氮比对厨余垃圾堆肥腐熟度的影响[J]. 环境工程,2013,31(2):87-91.
[9]刘文杰,王黎明,沈玉君,等. 碳氮比对蔬菜废弃物好氧发酵腐熟度及臭气排放的影响[J]. 环境工程,2020,38(6):233-239.
[10]黄晓凤,杨旭生,王启贵,等. 碳氮比对鹅粪渣-玉米秸秆混合堆肥效果的影响[J]. 西南农业学报,2019,32(5):1127-1132.
[11]YOGEV A, RAVIV M, HADAR Y， et al. Induced resistance as a putative component of compost suppressiveness[J]. Biological Control,2010,54(1):46-51.
[12]赵彬涵,孙宪昀,黄俊,等. 微生物在有机固废堆肥中的作用与应用[J]. 微生物学通报,2021,48(1):223-240.
[13]DUAN M L, ZHANG Y H, ZHOU B B, et al. Effects of bacillus subtilis on carbon components and microbial functional metabolism during cow manure-straw composting[J]. Bioresource Technology,2020,303:122868
[14]李季,任莉,付博. 堆肥微生物及堆肥接种研究进展[C]//中国微生物学会农业微生物学术委员会. 第十一届全国土壤微生物学术讨论会暨第六次全国土壤生物与生物化学学术研讨会,第四届全国微生物肥料生产技术研讨会论文(摘要)集. 北京：中国微生物学会农业微生物学术委员会，2010:44-52.
[15]樊斌,李明阳. 中国黄瓜种植收益影响因素贡献率的比较分析[J]. 北方园艺,2023(15):135-143.
[16]刘尚斌,郑祥洲,王煌平,等. 蝇蛆预处理及辅料添加对鸡粪堆肥氨挥发和温室气体排放的影响[J/OL]. 农业环境科学学报. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1347.s.20231030.1521.004.
[17]韩雪,常瑞雪,杜鹏祥,等. 不同蔬菜种类的产废比例及性状分析[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2015,32(4):377-382.
[18]马若男,李丹阳,亓传仁,等. 碳氮比对鸡粪堆肥腐熟度和臭气排放的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(24):194-202.
[19]VUORINEN A H, SAHARINEN M H. Evolution of microbiological and chemical parameters during manure and straw co composting in a drum composting system[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 1997, 66(1):19-29.
[20]中华人民共和国卫生部. 粪便无害化卫生要求:GB 7959-2012[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
[21]中华人民共和国农业农村部. 有机肥料:NY/T525-2021[S]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2021.
[22]贺琪,李国学,张亚宁,等. 高温堆肥过程中的氮素损失及其变化规律[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2005,24(1):169-173.
[23]魏晓强,钟启文,张广楠,等. 添加微生物菌剂对菊芋秸秆发酵的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2020,48(6):246-251.
[24]高建程,于金莲,石登荣,等. 不同预堆期对牛粪堆肥进程的影响研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2008,27(3):1214-1218.
[25]刘小鸿,李磊,郭小平,等. 翻堆和补水工艺对绿化废弃物堆肥腐熟度的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程,2018,18(7):281-287.
[26]嘎毕拉,罗维. 添加玉米秸秆对绿花菜尾菜堆肥植物毒性的影响[J]. 环境科学学报,2022,42(5):395-404.
[27]劳德坤,张陇利,李永斌,等. 不同接种量的微生物秸秆腐熟剂对蔬菜副产物堆肥效果的影响[J]. 环境工程学报,2015,9(6):2979-2985.
[28]张道利. 农业废物堆肥降低底泥重金属生物有效性及理化参数影响研究[D]. 长沙:湖南大学,2017.
[29]霍培书,陈雅娟,程旭艳,等. 添加VT菌剂和有机物料腐熟剂对堆肥的影响[J]. 环境工程学报,2013,7(6):2339-2343.
[30]陈雅娟,李季,杨耀峰. 鸡粪锯末好氧堆肥过程中主要指标及反硝化细菌动态变化[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2016,21(7):67-75.
[31]冯蓉,刘丽,杨胜竹,等. 好氧高温堆肥氮素损失及保氮技术研究进展[J]. 山地农业生物学报,2020,39(6):47-52.
[32]ODIMBA N, ONWOSI C, IGBOKWE V, et al. Composting technology in waste stabilization:on the methods, challenges and future prospects[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2017,190:140-157.
[33]次仁吉保,赵联芳,王成,等. 添加菌剂和不同C/N对葡萄枝条堆肥效果的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学,2019,47(2):71-74.
[34]金树权,周金波,徐志豪,等. 规模化畜禽养殖场沼渣好氧堆肥技术[J]. 浙江农业科学,2015,56(9):1491-1494.
[35]常瑞雪,王骞,甘晶晶,等. 易降解有机质含量对黄瓜秧堆肥腐熟和氮损失的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2017,33(1):231-237.
[36]胡雨彤,时连辉,刘登民,等. 添加硫酸对牛粪堆肥过程及其养分变化的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(3):718-725.
[37]朱宣霖,朱长伟,陈琛,等. 轮耕对豫北潮土速效养分及可溶性有机碳结构特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2022,30(4):683-693.
[38] LI Y X, LIU B, ZHANG X L, et al. Effects of Cu exposure on enzyme activities and selection for microbial tolerances during swine-manure composting[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2015,238:512-518.
[39]张桥,吴启堂,黄焕忠,等. 未消化城市污泥与稻草堆肥过程中的养分变化研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2002,21(6):489-492.
[40]刘源,罗渊,刘家辉,等. 牛粪好氧堆肥过程中植物毒性来源解析[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,42(5):118-128.
[41]施宠,张小娥,沙依甫加玛丽,等. 牛粪堆肥不同处理全N、P、K及有机质含量的动态变化[J]. 中国牛业科学,2010,36(4):26-29.
[42]杨雪,连宾,朱晓玲,等. 添加钾矿粉对鸡粪堆肥中N、P和K含量的影响[J]. 地球与环境,2012,40(2):286-292.
[43]王砚,李念念,朱端卫,等. 水稻秸秆预处理对猪粪高温堆肥过程的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2018,37(9):2021-2028.
[44]郭秋月,常瑞雪,孙霞,等. 初始物料水溶性有机碳含量对番茄秧堆肥进程的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜,2018,38(5):42-47.
[45]聂文军,嘎毕拉,金忠民,等. 对比研究槽式堆肥处理不同畜禽粪便对植物毒性的影响[J]. 环境科学学报,2020,40(7):2557-2570.
[46]罗渊,袁京,李国学,等. 种子发芽试验在低碳氮比堆肥腐熟度评价方面的适用性[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2016,35(1):179-185.
[47]张亚,师杨杰,姚均伟,等. 村镇有机生活垃圾处理产物对青菜品质及土壤性质的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2023,39(1):88-96.
[48]袁远,张金辉,李银月,等. 蔬菜废弃物好氧堆肥处理研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(19):29-35.
[49]赵欧亚,侯利敏,孙世友,等. 不同商品发酵菌剂对牛粪堆肥微生物群落的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(14):239-244.
[50]陈雪娇,王宇蕴,徐智,等. 不同磷石膏添加比例对稻壳与油枯堆肥过程的影响及基质化利用的评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2018,37(5):1001-1008.
[51]颜瑾,李燕,熊仁,等. 农村不同类型有机固体废弃物混合堆肥配比优化[J]. 环境工程学报,2018,12(7):2106-2113.
[52]董存明,张曼,邓小垦,等. 不同碳氮比条件下鸡粪和椰糠高温堆肥腐熟过程研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2015,31(3):420-424.
[53]游宏建,张美君,安明远,等. 不同堆肥材料及其碳氮比对餐厨废弃物堆肥进程中养分及微生物的影响[J]. 西南农业学报,2022,35(7):1631-1639.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐刚,高文瑞,王虹,等.不同初始pH值及覆盖材料对中药渣堆肥效果的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(06):1330.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.021]
　XU Gang,GAO Wen-rui,WANG Hong,et al.Effect of initial pH values and covering plastic films on herbal residues composting 〖WT5BZ〗XU Gang,GAO Wen-rui,WANG Hong,LI De-cui,SUN Yan-jun,HAN Bing,SHI Long-yan[J].,2015,(02):1330.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.021]
[2]古君禹,王秋君,孙倩,等.农林废弃物堆肥产物复配黄瓜育苗基质配方筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1238.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.010]
　GU Jun-yu,WANG Qiu-jun,SUN Qian,et al.Screening of agricultural and forestry wastes compost products based cultivation substrate formula for cucumber seedling culture[J].,2022,38(02):1238.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.010]
[3]张亚,师杨杰,姚均伟,等.村镇有机生活垃圾处理产物对青菜品质及土壤性质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(01):88.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.01.011]
　ZHANG Ya,SHI Yang-jie,YAO Jun-wei,et al.Effects of the products from treatment of organic domestic waste in villages and towns on the quality of Brassica chinensis and soil properties[J].,2023,(02):88.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.01.011]
[4]王瑞飞,孔盈利,魏艺璇,等.菌剂对鸡粪-生物炭堆肥理化性质和微生物群落结构的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(04):966.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.006]
　WANG Rui-fei,KONG Ying-li,WEI Yi-xuan,et al.Effects of microbial agents on physicochemical properties and microbial community structure of chicken manure-biochar compost[J].,2023,(02):966.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.006]
[5]赵华轩,李尚民,蒲俊华,等.鸡粪筒仓式反应器堆肥产品质量评估和经济效益分析[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(05):1159.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.05.008]
　ZHAO Hua-xuan,LI Shang-min,PU Jun-hua,et al.Quality assessment and economic benefit analysis of chicken manure compost products by silo reactor[J].,2023,(02):1159.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.05.008]
[6]杨婷,王守红,马林杰,等.好氧堆肥对生物炭理化性质及吸附Cd2+稳定性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(01):75.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.01.008]
　YANG Ting,WANG Shou-hong,MA Lin-jie,et al.Effects of aerobic composting on physicochemical properties of biochar and the adsorption stability of Cd2+[J].,2024,(02):75.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.01.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-12-28基金项目：国家重点研发计划项目子课题(2018YFD0800405-04)作者简介：张金辉(1996-),男,河南周口人,硕士研究生,主要从事固体废弃物资源化利用研究。(E-mail)418336656@qq.com通讯作者：袁远,(E-mail)yuanylc@henau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-17