[1]刘欢平,郑彩霞,刘涛,等.基于产量、品质和水氮利用效率的油橄榄水氮耦合方案优选[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(09):1843-1853.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.09.006]
　LIU Huan-ping,ZHENG Cai-xia,LIU Tao,et al.Priority of water-nitrogen coupling scheme for olive based on yield, quality, and water-nitrogen use efficiency[J].,2023,(09):1843-1853.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.09.006]
点击复制

基于产量、品质和水氮利用效率的油橄榄水氮耦合方案优选()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年09期
页码:
1843-1853
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2023-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Priority of water-nitrogen coupling scheme for olive based on yield, quality, and water-nitrogen use efficiency
作者:
刘欢平1; 2; 郑彩霞1; 刘涛1; 石琪仙1; 兰波2; 陈茜1; 闫敏1; 余文俊1; 袁小虎1; 张志亮1
(1.四川农业大学水利水电学院,四川雅安625000；2.聚峰谷农业科技开发有限公司,四川成都610000)
Author(s):
LIU Huan-ping1; 2; ZHENG Cai-xia1; LIU Tao1; SHI Qi-xian1; LAN Bo2; CHEN Xi1; YAN Min1; YU Wen-jun1; YUAN Xiao-hu1; ZHANG Zhi-liang1
(1.College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering of Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625000, China；2.Jufenggu Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610000, China)
关键词:
油橄榄; 水氮耦合; 产量; 品质; 水氮利用效率; TOPSIS法; 综合评分法
Keywords:
olive; water-nitrogen coupling; yield; quality; water-nitrogen use efficiency; technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method; comprehensive scoring method
分类号:
S565.7
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.09.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了实现油橄榄增产稳产、提质增效和可持续发展,探究龙泉山区油橄榄栽培中高效的水氮耦合方案,本研究的大田定位试验以9年生格洛桑作为研究材料,设置灌水、施氮2个因素,4个灌水量(I1:50.00%I4；I2:66.66%I4；I3:83.33%I4；I4:90.00%θfc；θfc为田间最大持水量)和4个施氮水平(N1:0 kg/hm2 N；N2:150 kg/hm2 N；N3:300 kg/hm2 N；N4:450 kg/hm2 N),共16个处理。分析灌水、施氮及其耦合处理对油橄榄产量、橄榄油品质及水氮利用效率的影响,利用优劣解距离(TOPSIS)法对橄榄油品质进行综合分析与评价,以油橄榄鲜果产量、橄榄油品质及水氮利用效率为评价指标,通过综合评分法对各个处理进行综合评价,探寻油橄榄水分、氮肥管理的最优处理。结果表明,N1I2处理油橄榄鲜果产量最低(4 333 kg/hm2),N4I3处理油橄榄鲜果产量最高(11 027 kg/hm2)；水氮耦合处理对橄榄油品质的影响极显著,对灌溉水利用效率(iWUE)、油橄榄鲜果产量及氮肥偏生产力(NPFP)的影响不显著；由综合评分法求得本研究条件下的最优处理为N2I3处理,油橄榄鲜果产量为6 293 kg/hm2,iWUE为52.44 kg/m3,NPFP为62.93 kg/kg；采用TOPSIS法进行油脂品质综合分析,发现N2I2处理得分最高,为0.787。本研究结果可为指导山区油橄榄高效、绿色生产提供理论依据。
Abstract:
In order to increase and stabilize the yield, improve the quality and efficiency, and achieve sustainable development of olive, we explored the efficient water and nitrogen coupling scheme in Longquan Mountain area, and used 9-year-old Grossane as the research material of field positioning experiment. We set four irrigation amounts (I1: 50.00%I4; I2: 66.66%I4; I3: 83.33%I4; I4: 90.00%θfc; θfc was the the maximum water holding capacity in the field) and four nitrogen application levels (N1: 0 kg/hm2 N; N2: 150 kg/hm2 N; N3: 300 kg/hm2 N; N4: 450 kg/hm2 N), a total of 16 treatments. The effects of irrigation, nitrogen application and their coupling treatment on olive yield, olive oil quality and water and nitrogen use efficiency were analyzed. The quality of olive oil was comprehensively analyzed and evaluated by technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The fresh fruit yield, olive oil quality and water and nitrogen utilization efficiency were used as evaluation indices. The comprehensive evaluation of each treatment was carried out by comprehensive scoring method to explore the optimal treatment of olive water and nitrogen fertilizer management. The results showed that the fresh fruit yield of olive under N1I2 treatment was the lowest (4 333 kg/hm2), and the fresh fruit yield of olive under N4I3 treatment was the highest (11 027 kg/hm2). The effects of water and nitrogen coupling treatment on the quality of olive oil were extremely significant, and the effects on irrigation water use efficiency (iWUE), fresh fruit yield and nitrogen partial factor productivity (NPFP) were not significant. According to the comprehensive scoring method, the optimal treatment under the conditions of this study was N2I3 treatment. The fresh fruit yield of olive was 6 293 kg/hm2, iWUE was 52.44 kg/m3, and NPFP was 62.93 kg/kg. TOPSIS method was used to comprehensively analyze the oil quality, and it was found that N2I2 treatment had the highest score of 0.787. The results of this study can provide a theoretical reference for guiding the efficient and green production of olive in mountainous areas.

参考文献/References:

[1]RUAN X, ZHU X M, XIONG H, et al. Characterisation of zero-trans margarine fats produced from camellia seed oil, palm stearin and coconut oil using enzymatic interesterification strategy[J]. International Journal of Food Science and Technology,2014,49(1):91-97.
[2]SU C J, SUN J F, ZHU W Z, et al. History, distribution, and potential of the olive industry in China: a review[J]. Sustainability,2018,10:1426.
[3]宁德鲁,陆斌,杜春花,等. 云南省油橄榄适宜栽培区的划分[J]. 林业科技开发,2008(5):39-41.
[4]李庆华,子桂才,洪献梅,等. 油橄榄品种‘阿尔波萨纳’的选育[J]. 中国果树,2020(6):93-94,142.
[5]吴文俊,赵梦炯,戚建莉,等. 油橄榄品种‘鄂植8号’的选育[J]. 中国果树,2020(5):111-113,141.
[6]邓明全. 油橄榄丰产稳产栽培技术研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2005(5):590-594.
[7]张进德,辛国,邓明全. 油橄榄优质丰产栽培技术[J]. 中国林副特产,2008(4):39-41.
[8]孔维宝,陈冬,杨树玲,等. 油橄榄与丛枝菌根真菌的共生效应研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(3):750-758.
[9]赵阳,赵曼利,焦润安,等. 陇南油橄榄主栽品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗性综合评价[J]. 热带作物学报,2017,38(9):1620-1627.
[10]梁剑. 干旱胁迫对油橄榄幼苗的影响[J]. 四川林业科技,2015,36(2):38-41.
[11]FRANCISCO S. Olive water use, crop coefficient, yield, and water productivity under two deficit irrigation strategies[J]. Agronomy,2018. DOI:10.3390/agronomy8060089.
[12]朱绍丹,陈丽,焦健,等. 土壤干旱及生草间作对油橄榄光合特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2019,35(2):282-288.
[13]曲继鹏,陈涛,冯士令,等. 氮磷肥施用量对油橄榄产量与品质的影响[J]. 西昌学院学报(自然科学版),2021,35(3):1-6,38.
[14]HABERMAN A, DAG A, SHTERN N, et al. Significance of proper nitrogen fertilization for olive productivity in intensive cultivation[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2019,246:710-717.
[15]LIU X, LI M, GUO P, et al. Optimization of water and fertilizer coupling system based on rice grain quality[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2019,221:34-46.
[16]刘艳伟,周潇,韩焕豪,等. 基于产量品质及水肥利用效率的三七水肥耦合方案优选[J]. 农业工程学报,2021,37(19):139-146.
[17]李运,张霁,徐福荣,等. 多指标决策分析TOPSIS对三七的质量评价研究[J]. 中草药,2017,48(22):4764-4771.
[18]汪加魏,张东升,李玉印,等. 油橄榄生长关键期施肥和灌溉技术研究[J]. 林产工业,2015,42(5):31-35.
[19]郜森,王恩煜,朱昌伟,等. 土壤含水量对温室甜瓜生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(12):89-96.
[20]陈修斌,杨彬,闫芳,等. 不同土壤含水量对日光温室茄子生长及生理特性影响[J]. 土壤通报,2009,40(2):231-234.
[21]张子龙,孙萌,李凯明,等. 基于TOPSIS-RSR法的三七连作障碍消减效应综合评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2015,23(6):713-724.
[22]张运书,曾德凤,刘雅庆. 基于变异系数法的长江经济带绿色治理能力综合评价[J]. 山西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,33(4):56-60.
[23]傅鹏霄,王珏,李广浩,等. 不同栽培模式对江苏省夏玉米产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2021,37(5):1151-1159.
[24]李红,汤攀,陈超,等. 中国水肥一体化施肥设备研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2021,39(2):200-209.
[25]张霞,李健,潘孝青,等. 不同熟化垫料替代比例对稻麦轮作下作物产量、土壤肥力及重金属的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2021,37(5):1175-1182.
[26]边巴卓玛. 拉萨河谷农区苦荞“3414”肥料效应试验研究[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2022,40(4):398-403.
[27]朱梅,顾佳林,储诚癸,等. 基于柱塞泵与单片机的可控施肥机设计与喷灌试验[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2021,39(11):1169-1176.
[28]赵颖,周枫,罗佳琳,等. 稻秸还田下不同施肥管理措施对土壤养分、冬小麦产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2021,37(5):1167-1174.
[29]王新,马富裕,刁明,等. 不同施氮水平下加工番茄植株生长和氮素积累与利用率的动态模拟[J]. 应用生态学报,2014,25(4):1043-1050.
[30]CENTENO A, GARCIA J M, GOMEZ-DEL-CAMPO M. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and nitrification inhibitor product on vegetative growth, production and oil quality in ‘Arbequina’ hedgerow and ‘Picual’ vase-trained orchards[J]. Grasas Y Aceites,2017,68(4):e215.
[31]AHUMADA-ORELLANA L E, ORTEGA-FARAS S, SEARLES P S, et al. Yield and water productivity responses to irrigation cut-off strategies after fruit set using stem water potential thresholds in a super-high density olive orchard[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2017,8:1280.
[32]付秋萍,赵经华,马亮,等. 塔里木盆地西北缘区密植核桃的滴灌水肥适宜用量[J]. 水土保持通报,2020,40(3):253-259.
[33]刘小刚,孙光照,彭有亮,等. 水肥耦合对芒果光合特性和产量及水肥利用的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2019,35(16):125-133.
[34]孙琛梅,程冬冬,杨越超,等. 土壤肥力质量与苹果生长、产量及品质关系的研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2022(2):207-215.
[35]WEI W, YE C, HUANG H C, et al. Appropriate nitrogen application enhances saponin synthesis and growth mediated by optimizing root nutrient uptake ability[J]. Journal of Ginseng Research,2020. DOI:10.1016/J.JGR.2019.04.003.
[36]张夸云,严毅,陈金龙,等. 调控措施对油橄榄果实品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树,2017,46(5):35-37,41.

相似文献/References:

[1]佚名 佚名 佚名.三才期刊采编系统文章正在整理中…[J].江苏农业学报,2005,(01):92.
　CHEN Hai yun,LI Yong jie,NING De lu,et al.三才期刊采编系统文章正在整理中…[J].,2005,(09):92.
[2]佚名 佚名 佚名.三才期刊采编系统文章正在整理中…[J].江苏农业学报,2006,(01):92.
　CHEN Hai yun,LI Yong jie,NING De lu,et al.三才期刊采编系统文章正在整理中…[J].,2006,(09):92.
[3]朱绍丹,陈丽,焦健,等.土壤干旱及生草间作对油橄榄光合特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(02):282.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.02.006]
　ZHU Shao-dan,CHEN Li,JIAO Jian,et al.Effects of soil drought and grass intercropping on photosynthetic characteristics of olive[J].,2019,(09):282.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.02.006]
[4]陈丽,焦健,朱绍丹,等.油橄榄对牧草间作与干旱胁迫交互作用的根系生理响应[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(06):1434.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.06.024]
　CHEN Li,JIAO Jian,ZHU Shao-dan,et al.Root physiological response of olive to the interaction of pasture intercropping and drought stress[J].,2019,(09):1434.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.06.024]
[5]陈丽,焦健,朱绍丹,等.牧草间作对干旱胁迫下油橄榄根系形态特征的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(01):39.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.006]
　CHEN Li,JIAO Jian,ZHU Shao-dan,et al.Effects of pasture intercropping on root morphological characteristics of olive under drought stress[J].,2020,(09):39.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-12-24基金项目:四川省科技厅项目(2019YJ0430)；四川省科技计划项目(2020YFH0207)；四川省重点实验室开放基金项目(SZKF2208)作者简介:刘欢平(1997-),男,贵州锦屏人,硕士研究生,主要从事农业水土工程方面的研究。(E-mail)2150413526@qq.com通讯作者:郑彩霞,(E-mail) caixia818@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-01-15