[1]王克晓,周蕊,黄祥,等.油菜角果高光谱成熟指数构建[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(03):716-723.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.03.012]
　WANG Ke-xiao,ZHOU Rui,HUANG Xiang,et al.Construction of rape silique ripening index based on hyperspectral characteristics[J].,2023,(03):716-723.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.03.012]
点击复制

油菜角果高光谱成熟指数构建()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
716-723
栏目:
农业信息工程
出版日期:
2023-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction of rape silique ripening index based on hyperspectral characteristics
作者:
王克晓; 周蕊; 黄祥; 虞豹; 李波
（重庆市农业科学院农业科技信息研究所，重庆401329）
Author(s):
WANG Ke-xiao; ZHOU Rui; HUANG Xiang; YU Bao; LI Bo
(Institute of Agricultural Information Science and Technology, Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China)
关键词:
油菜角果; 成熟度; 高光谱特征; 光谱指数
Keywords:
rape silique; maturity; hyperspectral characteristics; spectral index
分类号:
S127; S565.4
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.03.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为建立油菜角果成熟程度定量化评估指标，以不同品种、不同成熟等级的油菜角果为研究对象，在分析其非成像原始高光谱反射曲线、一阶微分变换光谱和连续统去除变换光谱的基础上，开展不同成熟等级油菜角果光谱特征差异研究，构建一种能够有效辨别油菜角果成熟程度的高光谱指数。结果表明，不同品种、不同成熟等级的油菜角果反射光谱差异较大，在625 nm两侧光谱反射率明显不同；油菜角果成熟等级越高，红光吸收谷越浅，其谷点波深越低，吸收谷反射率不断增强，红光吸收谷位置基本稳定在675 nm左右；选用625 nm、675 nm和730 nm 3个高光谱波段构建新的油菜角果成熟指数（CPMI2），与改进型叶绿素吸收比值指数（MCARI）、水波段指数（WBI）、油菜角果成熟指数（CPMI）3个光谱指数的决定系数分别为0.89、0.81和0.55，即与反映植被叶绿素含量、水分含量的光谱指数及已有的角果成熟指数有较高的相关性，与油菜角果成熟程度具有较好的一致性。本研究结果可为利用高光谱探测油菜角果成熟度，有效确定油菜适宜收获期提供参考。
Abstract:
In order to establish a quantitative evaluation index for rape silique maturity, the hyperspectral characteristics of rape siliques with different varieties and maturity levels were analyzed by the way of non-imaging original reflection curve, the first derivative transformation and continuous removal transformation, and a hyperspectral index that could effectively distinguish the maturity was constructed. The results showed that the reflectance spectra of rape siliques with different varieties and maturity levels were significantly different, especially around 625 nm. The higher the maturity level of rape siliques, the shallower the red light absorption valley, and the lower the wave depth of its valley point. The reflectivity of the absorption valley was enhanced, but the position of the red light absorption valley was basically stable at about 675 nm. The bands of 625 nm, 675 nm and 730 nm were selected to construct the canola pod maturity index-2 (CPMI2). The determination coefficients of CPMI2 with modified chlorophyll absorption ratio index (MCARI), water band index (WBI)and canola pod maturity index (CPMI) were 0.89, 0.81 and 0.55 respectively, indicating that CPMI2 had a high correlation with the spectral indices reflecting the chlorophyll content, water content and ripeness of pod, and had a better consistency with rape silique ripeness. The results of this study can provide a reference for the hyperspectral detection of rape silique maturity and the effective determination of the appropriate harvest time of rape.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘建刚,赵春江,杨贵军,等. 无人机遥感解析田间作物表型信息研究进展[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(24): 98-106.
[2]张锐,廖桂平,王访,等. 基于冠层高光谱的油菜角果期红边参数及叶片SPAD值反演模型[J].江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(20): 255-259.
[3]鲍义东,陈秋实,陈果. 高光谱技术在农业遥感中的应用[J].电子技术与软件工程, 2020(8):170-171.
[4]SCHMIDT K S, SKIDMORE A K. Spectral discrimination of vegetation types in a coastal wetland［J］.Remote Sensing of Environment,2003,85(1):92-108.
[5]MANSOUR K, MUTANGA O, EVERSON T, et al. Discriminating indicator grass species for rangeland degradation assessment using hyperspectral data resampled to AISA Eagle resolution［J］.ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,2012,70:56-65.
[6]ADAM E, MUTANGA O. Spectral discrimination of papyrus vegetationin (Cyperus papyrus L.) in swamp wetlands using field spectrometry[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,2009,64(6):612-620.
[7]胡琳,甘淑,袁希平,等. 滇中三类典型地表植被的机载高光谱特征分析[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2021, 41(10): 3208-3213.
[8]周伟,李浩然,石佩琪,等. 三江源区毒杂草型退化草地植被光谱特征分析[J].地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(8): 1735-1742.
[9]闫馨方,甘淑,胡琳,等. 昆明冬季典型作物的高光谱特征对比研究[J].测绘科学, 2021, 46(7): 60-66, 127.
[10]王汉中. 以新需求为导向的油菜产业发展战略[J].中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40(5): 613-617.
[11]高开秀. 冬油菜关键长势参数及产量遥感反演方法研究[D].武汉：华中农业大学, 2020.
[12]马驿,汪善勤,李岚涛,等. 基于高光谱的油菜叶面积指数估计[J].华中农业大学学报, 2017, 36(2): 69-77.
[13]杨婧,廖桂平,刘凡,等. 基于高光谱成像技术的油菜叶片叶绿素含量预测[J].中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(5): 86-96.
[14]郑煜,常庆瑞,王婷婷,等. 基于连续统去除和偏最小二乘回归的油菜SPAD高光谱估算[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(8): 37-45.
[15]赵赞忠. 油菜冠层特征光谱参数及其叶面积指数估测研究[D].长沙：湖南农业大学, 2018.
[16]李岚涛,任涛,汪善勤,等. 基于角果期高光谱的冬油菜产量预测模型研究[J].农业机械学报, 2017, 48(3): 221-229.
[17]常涛,谢鑫,官梅,等. 不同微肥处理下油菜产量与高光谱反射率关系分析[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2021, 41(2): 552-557.
[18]张素兰,覃菊,唐晓东,等. 松材线虫危害下马尾松光谱特征与估测模型研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2019, 39(3): 865-872.
[19]郑兰芬,王晋年. 成像光谱遥感技术及其图像光谱信息提取的分析研究[J].环境遥感,1992,7(1): 49-58.
[20]李粉玲,常庆瑞. 基于连续统去除法的冬小麦叶片全氮含量估算[J].农业机械学报, 2017, 48(7): 174-179.
[21]李喆,郭旭东,古春,等. 高光谱吸收特征参数反演草地光合有效辐射吸收率[J].遥感学报, 2016, 20(2): 290-302.
[22]BROGE N H, LEBLANC E. Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, 76(2): 156-172.
[23]陈鹏飞,NICOLAS T,王纪华,等. 估测作物冠层生物量的新植被指数的研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2010, 30(2): 512-517.
[24]SINGH K, DUDDU H, VAIL S, et al. UAV-based hyperspectral imaging technique to estimate canola (Brassica napus L.) seedpods maturity[J]. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2021, 47(1): 33-47.
[25]PENUELAS J, FILELLA I, BIEL C, et al. The reflectance at the 950-970 nm region as an indicator of plant water status[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1993, 14(10): 1887-1905.
[26]XUE J, SU B. Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: a review of developments and applications[J]. Journal of Sensors, 2017, 2017: 1-17.
[27]苏毅,王克如,李少昆,等. 棉花植株水分含量的高光谱监测模型研究[J].棉花学报, 2010, 22(6): 554-560.
[28]热依拉·艾合买提,吾木提·艾山江,阿不都艾尼·阿不里,等. 基于机器学习的春小麦叶片水分含量高光谱估算[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2022, 42(5): 640-648.
[29]刘畅,孙鹏森,刘世荣. 水分敏感的反射光谱指数比较研究——以锐齿槲栎为例[J].植物生态学报, 2017, 41(8): 850-861.
[30]吴朝阳,牛铮. 基于辐射传输模型的高光谱植被指数与叶绿素浓度及叶面积指数的线性关系改进[J].植物学通报, 2008, 25(6): 714-721.
[31]姜海玲,杨杭,陈小平,等. 利用光谱指数反演植被叶绿素含量的精度及稳定性研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35(4): 975-981.

相似文献/References:

[1]马中涛,马会珍,崔文培,等.成熟度对优良食味水稻南粳9108产量、品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(06):1353.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.06.002]
　MA Zhong-tao,MA Hui-zhen,CUI Wen-pei,et al.Effects of maturity on yield and quality of highly palatable rice Nanjing 9108[J].,2020,(03):1353.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.06.002]
[2]张斌斌,陈星星,王娜,等.基于果实品质指标的不同桃品种近冰温贮藏特性比较[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(04):998.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.04.024]
　ZHANG Bin-bin,CHEN Xing-xing,WANG Na,et al.Comparison of near-freezing temperature storage characteristics of different peach varieties based on fruit quality index[J].,2021,(03):998.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.04.024]
[3]徐慧敏,郭磊,马瑞娟,等.低温冷藏对桃砧木Nemaguard种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(01):200.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.01.024]
　XU Hui-min,GUO Lei,MA Rui-juan,et al.Effects of cold storage on seed germination and seedling growth of peach rootstock cultivar Nemaguard[J].,2022,38(03):200.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.01.024]
[4]蒋宝,侯清娥,高红芳,等.不同采收成熟度对设施冬枣综合品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(07):1312.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.07.018]
　JIANG Bao,HOU Qinge,GAO Hongfang,et al.Effects of different harvest maturity on the comprehensive quality of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. cv. Dongzao under protected cultivation condition[J].,2024,(03):1312.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.07.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-07-11 基金项目：重庆市农业科学院绩效激励引导项目(cqaas2021jxjl17)；重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项（cstc2021jscx-lyzxX0001）作者简介：王克晓（1986-），男，河南平顶山人，硕士，助理研究员，主要从事农业遥感相关研究。（E-mail）447215670@qq.com 通讯作者：周蕊，（E-mail）12087836@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-07-11