[1]周忠凯,李辉,秦竹,等.自然通风猪舍高压喷雾降温系统的降温效率[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(01):106-113.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.016]
　ZHOU Zhong-kai,LI Hui,QIN Zhu,et al.Cooling efficiency of a high-pressure fog cooling system for natural ventilation pig barn[J].,2018,(01):106-113.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.016]
点击复制

自然通风猪舍高压喷雾降温系统的降温效率()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
106-113
栏目:
畜牧兽医·水产养殖
出版日期:
2018-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Cooling efficiency of a high-pressure fog cooling system for natural ventilation pig barn
作者:
周忠凯1; 2; 李辉1; 2; 秦竹1; 2; 孙倩1; 2; 顾洪如3; 夏礼如1; 2; 余刚1; 2
（1.江苏省农业科学院农业设施与装备研究所，江苏南京210014；2.农业部长江中下游设施农业工程重点实验室,江苏南京210014；3.江苏省农业科学院畜牧研究所，江苏南京210014）
Author(s):
ZHOU Zhong-kai1; 2; LI Hui1; 2; QIN Zhu1; 2; SUN Qian11; 2; GU Hong-ru3; XIA li-ru1; 2; YU Gang1; 2
(1.Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;2.Key Laboratory for Protected Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanji
关键词:
猪舍; 高压喷雾降温系统; 温度; 相对湿度; 温湿度指数; 综合气候指数
Keywords:
pig barn; high-pressure fog cooling system; temperature; relative humidity; temperature-humidity index; comprehensive climate index
分类号:
S815.9
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为确定高压喷雾降温系统在夏季自然通风发酵床猪舍的适用性，选择2栋发酵床育肥猪舍，对不同气象条件下猪舍内的温湿度和风速进行了测定，选择温湿度指数、热负荷指数和综合气候指数3种指标评估了高压喷雾降温系统对猪舍内热环境的影响。结果显示试验期间高压喷雾系统的降温效率在18.4%至89.2%之间，平均为59.1%；与无喷雾猪舍相比，高压喷雾降温系统可有效降低舍内温度6.2 ℃，最高降低10.5 ℃，湿度增加23.9个百分点（平均湿度为72.2%）；整个试验期间，喷雾猪舍平均温湿度指数（THI）为74.3（比无喷雾猪舍降低12.2），热应激减少23.7%，喷雾猪舍热负荷减少2 713，综合气候指数（CCI）平均降低4.8 ℃。高压喷雾降温系统可以有效缓解自然通风发酵床猪舍内生猪遭受的热应激。
Abstract:
To investigate the suitability of high-pressure fogging system (HPFS) for natural ventilation pig barn (NVB) with bedding system， experiments were conducted in two naturally ventilated pig barns under summer conditions. One pig barn was used as the treatment barn (fogged house, FNVB) and another was used as the control house (un-fogged house, UFNVB). Cooling efficiency of HPFS was defined by determination of dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity and air velocity in the interior of pig barns in different weather conditions. Heat stress was assessed using the temperature humidity index (THI) and the daily THI-hrs index and comprehensive climate index (CCI) for evaluation of thermal comfort in pig barn. The results showed that the cooling efficiency of the HPFS ranged from 18.4% to 89.2%, and the average value was 59.1%. The HPFS could effectively decrease the indoor temperature by 6.2 ℃. The greatest difference of temperature between UFNVB and FNVB was 10.5 ℃. The air relative humidity in the FNVB was 72.2%, increased by 23.9%. The THI value was reduced by 12.2 in the FNVB (average value was 74.3). The values of the daily THI-hrs index and CCI under heat-stress conditions in FNVB were reduced by 2 713 and 4.8 ℃, respectively. In conclusion, high-pressure fog cooling system can effectively alleviate the heat stress of pigs in natural ventilation pig barn with bedding system.

参考文献/References:

[1]PLACE S E, MITLOEHNER F M. The nexus of environmental quality and livestock welfare [J]. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 2014, 2:555-569.
[2]NISSIM S. Effects of heat stress on the welfare of extensively managed domestic ruminants [J]. Livestock Production Science,2000, 67:1-18.
[3]BAUMGARD L H, RHOADS J R P. Effects of heat stress on postabsorptive metabolism and energetics [J]. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 2013, 1: 311-337.
[4]KUCZYNSKI T, BLANESVIDAL V, LI B M, et al. Impact of global climate change on the health, welfare and productivity of intensively housed livestock [J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2011, 4(1):1-22.
[5]NARDONE A, RONCHI B, LACETERA N, et al. Effects of climate changes on animal production and sustainability of livestock systems [J]. Livestock Science, 2010, 130: 57-69.
[6]PANAGAKIS P, AXAOPOULOS P. Comparing fogging strategies for pig rearing using simulations to determine apparent heat-stress indices [J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2008, 99: 112-118.
[7]BRIDGES T C, GATES R S, TURNER L W. Stochastic assessment of evaporative misting for growing-finishing swine in Kentucky [J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 1992, 8(5): 685-693.
[8]WANG C, CAO W, LI B, et al. A fuzzy mathematical method to evaluate the suitability of an evaporative pad cooling system for poultry houses in China [J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2008, 101(3): 395-405.
[9]LUCAS E M, RANDALL J M, MENESES J F, et al. Potential for evaporative cooling during heat stress periods in pig production in Portugal (Alentejo) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 2000, 76: 363-371.
[10]谢雨晴,刘潆蔚,王美芝,等. 有窗密闭式猪舍水空调技术夏季降温效果[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2015, 36(10): 49-55.
[11]马承伟,苗香雯. 农业生物环境工程[M]. 北京：中国农业出版社，2005.
[12]DONG H, TAO X, LI Y, et al. Comparative evaluation of cooling systems for farrowing sows [J]. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2001, 17: 91-96.
[13]朱志平. 开放式猪舍通风与喷雾蒸发降温系统的研究[D]. 合肥：安徽农业大学，2002.
[14]HAEUSSERMANN A, HARTUNG E, JUNGBLUTH T, et al. Cooling effects and evaporation characteristics of fogging systems in an experimental piggery [J].Biosystems Engineering, 2007, 97: 395-405.
[15]BOTTO L, LENDELOV J, STRMEVOV A, et al. The effect of evaporative cooling on climatic parameters in a stable for sows [J]. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 60 (Special Issue):85-91.
[16]TOIDA H, KOZAI T, OHYAMA K, et al. Enhancing fog evaporation rate using an upward air stream to improve greenhouse cooling performance. Biosystems Engineering, 2006, 93(2)：205-211.
[17]ABDELGHANY A M, KOZAI T. Cooling efficiency of fogging systems for greenhouses [J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2006, 94(1): 97-109.
[18]FRANCO A, VALERA D L, PEA A. Energy efficiency in greenhouse evaporative cooling techniques: cooling boxes versus cellulose pads [J]. Energies ,2014, 7: 1427-1447
[19]STULL R B. Wet-Bulb temperature from relative humidity and air temperature [J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2011, 50 (11): 2267-2269.
[20]BOHMANOVA J, MISZTAL I, COLE J B. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2007, 90(4): 1947-1956.
[21]SEGNALINI M, BERNABUCCI U, VITALI A, et al. Temperature humidity index scenarios in the Mediterranean basin [J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2013, 57: 451-458.
[22]SEGNALINI M, NARDONE A, BERNABUCCI U, et al. Dynamics of the temperature-humidity index in the Mediterranean basin [J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2011, 55: 253-263.
[23]WEGNER K, LAMBERTZ C, DA �瘙 塁 G, et al. Climatic effects on sow fertility and piglet survival under influence of a moderate climate [J]. Animal, 2014, 8(9): 1526-1533.
[24]ZHOU Z, QIN Z, LI H, et al. Evaluation of temperature-humidity index in a growing-finishing pig bedding system [C]//NI J Q, LIM T T, WANG C. Animal environment and welfare-proceedings of international symposium. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2015: 34-41.
[25]PAPANASTASIOU D, BARTZANAS T, PANAGAKIS P. Assessment of a typical Greek sheep barn based on potential heat-stress of dairy ewes [J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2015, 30(6): 953-959.
[26]PANAGAKIS P, CHRONOPOULOU E. Preliminary evaluation of the apparent short term heat-stress of dairy ewes reared under hot summer conditions [J]. Applied Eng in Agric, 2010, 26(6):1035-1042.
[27]MADER T L, JOHNSON L J, GAUGHAN J B. A comprehensive index for assessing environmental stress in animals [J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2010, 88:2153-2165
[28]张艳玲. 遮阳网对夏季温室小气候影响的研究[D]. 南京：南京农业大学，2008.
[29]FRANCO A, VALERA D L, PEA A. Energy efficiency in greenhouse evaporative cooling techniques: Cooling boxes versus cellulose pads [J]. Energies, 2014, 7: 1427-1447.
[30]LI S, WILLITS D H. Comparing low-pressure and high-pressure fogging systems in naturally ventilated greenhouses [J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2008, 101(1): 69-77.
[31]CIGR. Report of working group on climatization of animal houses [EB/OL].(1984)
[2016-04-25] http://www.cigr.org/documents/CIGR-Workinggroupreport1984.
[32]AXAOPOULOS P, PANAGAKIS P. Simulation comparison of evaporative pads and fogging on air temperature inside a growing swine building [J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2006, 49(1): 215-219.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2017-07-07 基金项目：江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(12)1001-04]；江苏省科技支撑计划项目(BE2014342-1) 作者简介：周忠凯（1984-），男，山东茌平人，硕士，助理研究员，主要从事畜禽生产过程环境质量控制与污染物排放监测研究，(E-mail)zhouzk@jaas.ac.cn 通讯作者：余刚，(E-mail)yug55@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-06