[1]靳红梅,沈明星,王海候,等.秸秆还田模式对稻麦两熟农田麦季CH4和N2O排放特征的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(02):333-339.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.015]
　JIN Hong-mei,SHEN Ming-xing,WANG Hai-hou,et al.Influence of straw returning patterns on methane and nitrous oxide emission during wheat-growing season in a rice-wheat double cropping system[J].,2017,(02):333-339.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.015]
点击复制

秸秆还田模式对稻麦两熟农田麦季CH4和N2O排放特征的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
333-339
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2017-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influence of straw returning patterns on methane and nitrous oxide emission during wheat-growing season in a rice-wheat double cropping system
作者:
靳红梅12; 沈明星3; 王海候3; 陆长婴3; 常志州12; 郭瑞华1
（1.江苏省农业科学院循环农业研究中心/江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心，江苏南京210014；2.农业部长江中下游平原农业环境重点实验室，江苏南京210014；3.江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所，江苏苏州215155）
Author(s):
JIN Hong-mei12; SHEN Ming-xing3; WANG Hai-hou3; LU Chang-ying3; CHANG Zhi-zhou12; GUO Rui-hua1
(1.Circular Agriculture Research Center, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China;2.Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China;3.Taihu Research Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Suzhou 215155, China)
关键词:
秸秆还田模式; 麦季; CH4; N2O; 排放特征
Keywords:
straw returning pattern; wheat-growing season; CH4; N2O; emission characteristics
分类号:
X71
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了探讨不同秸秆还田模式下稻麦两熟农田麦季CH4和N2O的排放规律，以江苏省南部地区稻麦两熟农田为研究对象，进行了8年不同秸秆还田模式[即仅麦季稻秸秆还田处理（R）、仅稻季麦秸秆还田（W）和稻麦季秸秆均还田（RW）]的田间定位试验，采用静态箱-气相色谱法分析各处理麦季田间CH4和N2O的排放特征。结果表明，与秸秆不还田对照（CK）相比，秸秆还田可增加麦季CH4和N2O的排放通量。各处理间CH4的累积排放量大小为R处理>RW处理>W处理>CK对照，麦季N2O的累积排放量大小为W处理>R处理>RW处理>CK对照。各秸秆还田模式（R、W、RW）下，麦季CH4和N2O的全球增温潜势（GWP）分别为1 225.5 kg/hm2,CO2-eq、1 250.9 kg/hm2,CO2-eq和1 214.5 kg/hm2,CO2-eq，均显著（P<0.05）高于秸秆不还田的1 068.5 kg/hm2,CO2-eq。各处理间的单位产量GWP表现为RW处理＞W处理＞R处理＞CK对照，稻麦秸秆均全量还田对气候变化的影响最大。N2O对总增温潜势的贡献率大于95%，是麦季减排的主要对象。从对气候变化影响的角度考虑，建议秸秆单季还田时采用稻秸秆全量还田。
Abstract:
In order to investigate methane(CH4) and nitrous oxide(N2O) emission fluxes under different straw returning patterns, an 8-year field trial in Suzhou, typical rice-wheat double cropping region in southern area of Jiangsu province, was conducted using static chamber-gas chromatograph technique in situ. Straw returning patterns were rice straw returning (R), wheat straw returning (W), both rice straw and wheat straw returning (RW) and no straw returning treatment (CK). The results showed that total CH4 and N2O emissions in straw returning treatments were significantly （P<0.05） higher than those in CK treatment, but the changes between the three straw returning patterns were not distinct. Total CH4 emissions under different treatments followed the order of R>RW>W>CK, while W>R>RW>CK for the total N2O emission during the whole wheat-growing season. Global warming potentials (GWPs) for treatments of R, W and RW were 1 225.5 kg/hm2,CO2-eq, 1 250.9 kg/hm2,CO2-eq and 1 214.5 kg/hm2,CO2-eq, respectively, which were significantly （P<0.05） higher than that of CK treatment
［1 068.5 kg/hm2,CO2-eq］. The yield-scaled GWPs between treatments followed the order of RW＞W＞R＞CK, showing that both rice straw and wheat straw returning pattern had the most significant impact on climate change during wheat-growing season. The contribution rates of N2O to GWPs were more than 95% for all straw returning treatments, indicating that N2O was the main objection for greenhouse gas reductions during wheat-growing season. Given that R treatment had the least GWP, rice straw returning pattern should be recommended for one-season straw returning application.

参考文献/References:

［1］杨建昌,杜永,刘辉. 长江下游稻麦周年超高产栽培途径与技术[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(6): 1611-1621.
［2]常志州,王德建,杨四军,等. 对稻麦秸秆还田问题的思考[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2014, 30(2): 304-309.
［3]顾克军,张斯梅,许博,等. 江苏省水稻秸秆资源量及其可收集量估算[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(1): 32-36.
［4]常志州,石祖梁,张斯梅,等. “区域统筹、整体推进、终端扶持”是破解秸秆禁烧与全量利用的根本出路[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2015，32(4):321-326.
［5]苏衍涛,王凯荣,刘迎新,等. 稻草覆盖对红壤旱地土壤温度和水分的调控效应[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(2): 670-676.
［6]马超,周静,刘满强,等. 秸秆促腐还田对土壤养分及活性有机碳的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2013, 50 (5): 915-921.
［7]刘冲，王茂文，刘兴华，等．苏北沿海滩涂秸秆还田对大麦生长及土壤质量的影响［J］．江苏农业科学，2015,43(7):414-415,425.
［8]李倩,张睿,贾志宽. 玉米旱作栽培条件下不同秸秆覆盖量对土壤酶活性的影响[J]．干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(4): 152-154.
［9]高大响，黄小忠，王亚萍．秸秆还田及腐熟剂对土壤微生物特性和酶活性的影响［J］．江苏农业科学，2016,44(12):468-471.
［10]张志国,徐琪,BLEVINS R L. 长期秸秆覆盖免耕对土壤某些理化性质及玉米产量的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 1998, 35(3): 384-391.
［11]洪德峰，陈红，唐振海，等. 不同深耕方式和秸秆还田对夏玉米植株性状及籽粒产量的影响［J］．　山东农业科学，2015,47(1):26-28.
［12]张岳芳,陈留根,朱普平,等.秸秆还田对稻麦两熟高产农田净增温潜势影响的初步研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(8): 1647-1653.
［13]MA E D, ZHANG G B, MA J, et al. Effects of rice straw returning methods on N2O emission during wheat-growing season[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2010, 88(3): 463-469.
［14]MA J, XU H, KAZUYUKI Y, et al. Methane emission from paddy soils as affected by wheat straw returning mode[J]. Plant and Soil, 2008, 313(2): 167-174.
［15]LASHOF D A, AHUJA D R. Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to the global warming[J]. Nature, 1990, 344(6266): 529-531.
［16]CALLANDER B A, VARNEY S K. The supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment[R]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
［17]张岳芳,陈留根,朱普平,等. 秸秆还田对稻麦两熟高产农田净增温潜势影响的初步研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(8): 1647-1653.
［18]CHAPUIS-LARDY L, WRAGE N, METAY A, et al. Soils, a sink for N2O? Review[J]. Global Change Biology, 2007, 13(1): 1-17.
［19]王海候,沈明星,陆长婴,等. 不同秸秆还田模式对稻麦两熟农田稻季甲烷和氧化亚氮排放的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2014, 30(4): 758-763.
［20]马静,徐华,蔡祖聪,等. 稻季施肥管理措施对后续麦季N2O排放的影响[J]. 土壤, 2006，38（6）: 672-691.
［21]鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
［22]徐华,邢光熹,蔡祖聪,等. 土壤水分状况和质地对稻田N2O排放的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2000, 37(4): 499-505.
［23]SHANG Q, YANG X, GAO C, et al. Net annual global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in Chinese double rice-cropping systems: a 3-year field measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(6): 2196-2210.
［24]ZHAO M, TIAN Y, MA Y, et al. Mitigating gaseous nitrogen emissions intensity from a Chinese rice cropping system through an improved management practice aimed to close the yield gap[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015, 203: 36-45.

相似文献/References:

[1]魏思雨,王亚波,邵阳,等.近地层大气臭氧浓度升高对麦季土壤Ｚｎ 生物有效性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):791.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.013]
　WEI Si-yu,WANG Ya-bo,SHAO Yang,et al.Influence of elevated tropospheric ozone on the bioavailability of zinc in wheat-planted soil[J].,2016,(02):791.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.013]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2016-10-20 基金项目：江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(12)1002] 作者简介：靳红梅（1982-），女，河北吴桥人，博士，副研究员，主要从事农业废弃物资源化利用和环境影响评价研究。（Tel）025-84390238；（E-mail）hmjin@jaas.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-02