[1]丰智松,李增源,张卫峰,等.上海温州蜜柑叶片营养诊断及优化施肥策略[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1357-1365.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.023]
　FENG Zhi-song,LI Zeng-yuan,ZHANG Wei-feng,et al.Leaf nutrition diagnosis and fertilization optimization strategy of Shanghai Satsuma[J].,2022,38(05):1357-1365.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.023]
点击复制

上海温州蜜柑叶片营养诊断及优化施肥策略()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
38
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
1357-1365
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2022-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Leaf nutrition diagnosis and fertilization optimization strategy of Shanghai Satsuma
作者:
丰智松1; 李增源1; 张卫峰1; 陈磊2; 安琪琪3
（1.中国农业大学资源与环境学院，北京100083；2.上海市崇明区生态农业科创中心，上海崇明202150；3.上海市崇明区农产品质量安全中心，上海崇明202150)
Author(s):
FENG Zhi-song1; LI Zeng-yuan1; ZHANG Wei-feng1; CHEN Lei2; AN Qi-qi3
(1.College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China;2.Shanghai Chongming District Ecological Agriculture Innovation Center, Shanghai 202150, China;3.Shanghai Chongming District Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Center, Shanghai 202150, China)
关键词:
温州蜜柑; 叶片; 矿质养分; 营养诊断; 施肥
Keywords:
Satsuma mandarin; leaf; mineral nutrient; nutrition diagnosis; fertilization
分类号:
S666.1
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以上海市崇明区70个代表性温州蜜柑果园为研究对象，根据叶片DRIS、M-DRIS、DOP诊断法和边界线方法，对果园进行叶片矿质养分含量的测定及营养平衡诊断，为温州蜜柑丰产优质科学施肥提供依据。结果显示：（1）高产园和低产园间叶片中大多矿质养分含量差异不显著，低产园叶片矿质养分含量变异范围高于高产园；（2）应用边界线方法确定温州蜜柑叶片矿质养分的适宜范围为N 2.80%～3.10%、P2O5 0.17%～0.23%、K2O 0.71%～1.50%、Ca 3.40～4.80 g/kg、Mg 0.30～0.50 g/kg、Fe 89.00～129.00 mg/kg、Mn 21.00～63.00 mg/kg、Cu 5.00～12.00 mg/kg、Zn 11.00～20.00 mg/kg、B 33.00～101.00 mg/kg ;（3）DRIS、M-DRIS和DOP方法建立的养分平衡值（NBIm）与产量呈显著负相关，说明养分之间的平衡性是产量的主要限制因素。不同诊断方法推荐的养分平衡调节优先序基本一致，其中DRIS法和M-DRIS法建立的养分平衡调节优先序均为：Mn>K>Zn；可见，DOP法建立的养分平衡优先序为：Mn>K>N。可见，上海市温州蜜柑果园树体内各矿质元素间比例平衡关系对产量的影响更为显著，应采用叶片营养平衡诊断方法，制定更精准的施肥方案。
Abstract:
The content of mineral elements in leaves of Satsuma mandarin in Chongming, Shanghai, was determined, so as to provide the basis for scientific fertilization. The nutritional status of leaves in 70 representative citrus orchards in Chongming District was diagnosed by DRIS, M-DRIS, DOP and boundary line methods. Results showed that there was no significant difference in the content of most mineral elements in leaves between high-yield and low-yield orchards, and the variation range of leaf mineral nutrients in low-yield orchard was higher than that in high-yield orchard. The suitable range of mineral nutrients in leaves of Satsuma mandarin was determined by boundary line method as N 2.80%-3.10%, P2O5 0.17%-0.23%, K2O 0.71%-1.50%, Ca 3.40-4.80 g/kg, Mg 0.30-0.50 g/kg, Fe 89.00-129.00 mg/kg, Mn 21.00-63.00 mg/kg, Cu 5.00-12.00 mg/kg, Zn 11.00-20.00 mg/kg, B 33.00-101.00 mg/kg. Nutrient balance values (NBIm) established by DRIS, M-DRIS and DOP methods were significantly negatively correlated with yield, indicating that the balance between nutrients was the main limiting factor of yield. The priorities of nutrient balance regulation recommended by different diagnostic methods were basically the same. The priorities of nutrient balance regulation established by DRIS method and M-DRIS method were Mn>K>Zn. The priority order of nutrient balance established by DOP method was Mn>K>N. It can be seen that the proportion balance of mineral elements in the trees of Satsuma mandarin orchard in Shanghai has a more significant effect on the yield, so the diagnosis method of leaf nutrient balance should be adopted to formulate a more accurate fertilization plan.

参考文献/References:

[1]赵晓春. 加强产业化建设做强中国果业[J]. 中国果业信息, 2017, 34(1): 7.
[2]中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020.
[3]何苇竹. 我国柑橘叶片矿质养分含量标准的建立及营养诊断[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2020.
[4]任节红. 崇明柑橘产业现状和发展思路[J]. 上海农业科技, 2017(5): 13-15.
[5]骆军,张学英,陆颖,等. 上海崇明柑橘生产若干问题调查及提高柑橘效益措施[J]. 上海农业科技, 2014(2): 69-71.
[6]周学伍,惠龙明. 锦橙叶片矿质营养元素含量指标的研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 1991, 13(1): 15-20.
[7]庄伊美,李来荣,王仁玑,等. 福建椪柑丰产园营养状况的初步研究[J]. 福建农学院学报, 1985, 14(1): 23-29.
[8]庄伊美,王仁玑,周阵龙,等. 琯溪蜜柚叶片营养元素适宜含量的研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 1991, 6(2): 52-58.
[9]曹立,彭良志,江才伦,等. 赣南不同土壤类型脐橙园叶片营养状况研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2012(2): 5-9.
[10]BEAUFILS E R. Diagnosis and recommendation integrate system (DRIS)[J]. Soil Science Bulletin (University of Natal, Pieter maritzburg, South Africa), 1973, 1:1-132.
[11]WALWORTH J L. Preliminary DRIS norms for alfalfa in the southeastern United States and a comparison with midwestern norms[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1986, 78(6): 1046-1052.
[12]MAURO F F A A. DRIS: concepts and applications on nutritional diagnosis in fruit crops[J]. Sci Agric, 2004, 61(5): 550-560.
[13]BANGROO S A, BHAT M I, ALI T, et al. Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS)-A review[J]. International Journal of Current Research, 2010, 10: 84-97.
[14]MONTANES L, HERAS L, ABADIA J, et al. Plant analy-sis interpretation based on a new index: Deviation from opti-mum percentage (DOP) [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1993, 16(7): 1289-1308.
[15]TORRES P L, AULAR J, RENGEL M. Nutritional diagnosis of orange orchards in Yaracuy State by using the modified DRIS[J]. Bioagro, 2010, 22(2): 127-134.
[16]冯大兰,魏立本,黄小辉,等. 梁平柚果实膨大期叶片矿质营养诊断研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2020, 44(2): 111-116.
[17]NACHTIGALL G R, DECHEN A R. DRIS use on apple orchard nutritional evaluation in response to potassium fertilization[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2007, 38(17/18): 2557-2566.
[18]GOUDDARZI K A. Evaluation of nutritional balance for grape orchards of sisakht region in kohgiluyeh-va-boyerahmad province by deviation from optimum percentage method[J]. Iranian Journal of Soil and Waters Sciences, 2005, 19(1): 26-34.
[19]WADT P G S, SILVA D J, MAIA C E, et al. Modelling of functions in calculating DRIS indices[J]. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 2007, 42(1): 57-64.
[20]AGBANGBA E C, SOSSA E L, DAGBENONBAKIN G D, et al. DRIS model parameterization to access pineapple variety ‘ Smooth Cayenne’nutrient status in Benin[J]. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 2011, 1(5): 254-264.
[21]PINHO P J, CARVALHO J G, RODRIGUES M G, et al. Nivel desuficiencia dezinco para bananeira ‘Prata Ana’ pormeio do DRIS[J]. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, 2007, 29(1): 69-74.
[22]CERD A, NIEVES M, MARTNEZ V. An evaluation of mineral analysis of ‘Verna’ lemons by DRIS[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1995, 26(11/12): 1697-1707.
[23]鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[24]AMIR H, AFSHIN S, EBRAHIM Z, et al. Using boundary line analysis to assess the on-farm crop yield gap of wheat[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 225: 64-73.
[25]鲁剑巍. 湖北省柑橘园土壤-植物养分状况与柑橘平衡施肥技术研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2003.
[26]王莉,叶小梅,杜静,等. 江苏省苏翠1号梨叶养分标准值初探[J]. 江苏农业学报,2021,37(5):1278-1284.
[27]VELEMIS D, ALMALITIS D, BLADENOPOULOU S, et al. Leaf nutrient levels of apple orchards in relation to crop yield[J]. Advances in Horticultural Science, 1999, 13(4): 147-150.
[28]郑永强,王娅,易时来,等. 重庆三峡库区鲍威尔脐橙花期叶片矿质营养诊断[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(12): 2378-2390.
[29]吴良泉,张世昌,朱东煌,等. 琯溪蜜柚品质综合评价及优质高产的营养诊断[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(9): 1693-1699.
[30]朱攀攀,李有芳,彭良志,等. 云南玉溪柑橘园土壤养分水平和叶片营养状况相关性分析[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(12): 1658-1666.
[31]马海洋,张金水,林文,等. 渭北旱塬红富士苹果不同时期叶片营养诊断[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(6): 752-756.
[32]黄鸿. 湖北省秭归地区三个品种脐橙矫正施肥及其效应研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2012.
[33]周开兵,郭文武,夏仁学,等. 不同砧木对柑橘幼树生长和叶片糖含量的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2005, 13(1): 17-20.
[34]SHAH Z, SHAH M Z, TARIQ M, et al．Survey of citrus orchards for micronutrients deficiency in Swat valley of north western Pakistan[J]. Pak J Bot, 2012, 44(2): 705-710.
[35]杜新民. 锌锰配施对小白菜产量品质及生理指标影响的研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2008.
[36]宋潇. 锌胁迫对枳和枳橙砧木的生理特性和锌分配的影响[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2014.
[37]梁国现. 施用锌肥对脐橙生长结果的影响[J]. 南方园艺, 2018, 29(4): 14-16.
[38]董燕,王正银. 矿质营养对柑橘品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2004(6): 37-40.
[39]宁川川,王建武,蔡昆争. 有机肥对土壤肥力和土壤环境质量的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(1): 175-181.
[40]ABU-ZAHRA T R, ABUBAKER S M, TAHBOUB A B, et al. Effect of organic matter sources on micronutrients and heavy metals accumulation in soil [J]. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 2010,8(3/4): 1199-1202.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘红江,陈虞雯,张岳芳,等.不同播栽方式对水稻叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
　LIU Hong-jiang,CHEN Yu-wen,ZHANG Yue-fang,et al.Effects of planting pattern on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice[J].,2016,(05):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
[2]何俊平,朱家成,王建平,等.甘蓝型油菜幼苗显微组织结构与抗寒性的关系[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(01):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.004 ]
　HE Jun-ping,ZHU Jia-cheng,WANG Jian-ping,et al.The relationship between seedling microtructure and cold resistance of Brassica napus[J].,2017,(05):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.004 ]
[3]张玉琴,周蕾,王永,等.温度对烟草叶片细胞壁物质含量及组成变化的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(01):39.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.01.005]
　ZHANG Yu-qin,ZHOU Lei,WANG Yong,et al.Effects of temperature on content and composition of cytoderm substances in tobacco leaves[J].,2022,38(05):39.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.01.005]
[4]朱璐,闻婧,马秋月,等.鸡爪槭金陵丹枫和金陵黄枫叶片呈色分析[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(02):521.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.02.028]
　ZHU Lu,WEN Jing,MA Qiu-yue,et al.Analysis on leaf colour generation of Acer palmatum Jinling Danfeng and Jinling Huangfeng[J].,2022,38(05):521.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.02.028]
[5]付沃兴,刘德春,匡柳青,等.透湿性反光膜对柑橘果皮蜡质晶体结构和组成成分的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(04):1062.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.04.024]
　FU Wo-xing,LIU De-chun,KUANG Liu-qing,et al.Effects of vapor-permeable reflective film on cuticular wax structure and composition of citrus[J].,2022,38(05):1062.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.04.024]
[6]宋燕芳,彭彤,马少兰,等.枸杞叶片酚酸类物质的自毒作用分析[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(02):213.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.02.003]
　SONG Yan-fang,PENG Tong,MA Shao-lan,et al.Analyzing the autotoxicity of phenolic acids from Lycium barbarum L. leaves[J].,2024,(05):213.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.02.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-01-12基金项目：上海市科技兴农项目[沪农科推字（2020）第2-2号]作者简介：丰智松（1996-），男，河北邢台人，硕士研究生，主要从事植物营养与高效施肥研究。(E-mail)18730279136@163.com通讯作者：张卫峰，(E-mail)wfzhang@cau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-07