[1]杜军利,梁岳,卢福岗,等.玉米蚜刺吸对不同抗性玉米品种光合性能及生物量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(04):735-740.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.04.003]
 DU Jun-li,LIANG Yue,LU Fu-gang,et al.Effects of corn leaf aphids attack on photosynthetic properties and biomass of maize varieties with different resistance[J].,2018,(04):735-740.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.04.003]
点击复制

玉米蚜刺吸对不同抗性玉米品种光合性能及生物量的影响()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
735-740
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2018-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of corn leaf aphids attack on photosynthetic properties and biomass of maize varieties with different resistance
作者:
杜军利梁岳卢福岗詹秋文武德功余海兵黄保宏李文阳
(安徽科技学院农学院,安徽凤阳233100)
Author(s):
DU Jun-liLIANG YueLU Fu-gangZHAN Qiu-wenWU De-gongYU Hai-bingHUANG Bao-hongLI Wen-yang
(1.College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, China)
关键词:
玉米蚜光合性能光合速率蒸腾速率生物量
Keywords:
Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch)photosynthetic characteristicsphotosynthetic ratetranspiration ratebiomass
分类号:
S513;S432.2+3
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了阐明玉米蚜刺吸危害对不同抗性玉米品种光合性能及生物量的影响,在对4个玉米品种进行抗蚜级别鉴定的基础上,比较研究了这4个玉米品种在玉米蚜为害5 d后光合指标和生物量的变化。结果显示:4个玉米品种郑单958、 蠡玉16、中单909和敦煌1号的抗蚜级别分别为抗、感、感和高感;4个玉米品种被玉米蚜刺吸5 d后叶片的大部分光合指标与对照差异不显著;抗蚜品种郑单958被玉米蚜刺吸5 d后,除了叶绿素SPAD值低于对照外,叶片的净光合速率、叶片气孔导度、蒸腾速率、胞间二氧化碳浓度、水分利用效率均呈正向变化, 净光合速率、叶片气孔导度、蒸腾速率均显著高于 中单909和敦煌1号(P<005)。在玉米蚜刺吸5 d后4个玉米品种的株高、根系长度与对照相比均无显著差异(P>005),而蠡玉16的根系数量显著多于对照(P<005),郑单958的植株鲜质量显著高于对照(P<005)。玉米蚜刺吸在某种程度上促进了抗蚜玉米品种的光合作用,增加了部分生物量,而感蚜玉米品种则受到抑制。
Abstract:
In order to clarify the effects of corn leaf aphid sucking on photosynthetic properties and biomass of with maize varieties different resistances, four maize varieties Zhengdan 958, Liyu 16, Zhongdan909, Dunhuang No.1 were selected for this test and the resistances of four maize varieties to corn leaf aphids, Rhopalosiphum maidis, were evaluated. The changes of photosynthetic properties and biomass of the four maize varieties were compared after being sucked five days by corn leaf aphid. The results showed that the resistance levels of the four varieties to corn leaf aphids were resistible (Zhengdan 958), susceptible (Liyu 16), susceptible (Zhongdan 909) and highly susceptible (Dunhuang No.1). Most of the photosynthetic indices of the four varieties after being sucked five days by corn aphid were not significantly different compared with the control. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), leaf stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and water-use efficiency (WUE) of Zhengdan 958 were respectively higher than those of the control, but the chlorophyll value was lower than that of the control. The net photosynthetic rate, leaf stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of Zhengdan 958 were significantly higher than those of Zhongdan 909 and Dunhuang No.1 (P<005). The plant height and root length of the four varieties were not significantly different compared with the control(P>0.05). The number of roots of Liyu 16 was significantly more than that of the control (P<005). The fresh weight of Zhengdan 985 was significantly higher than that of the control (P<005). The above results indicated that photosynthesis of resistible maize varieties was promoted to some extent by corn leaf aphids sucking, and some biomass indices showed an increasing trend. The photosynthetic properties of susceptible maize varieties, however, were inhibited.

参考文献/References:

[1]路立平,赵化春,赵娜,等. 世界玉米产业现状及发展前景[J]. 玉米科学, 2006, 14(5):149-151,156.
[2]徐春丽,谢军,王珂,等. 中国西南地区玉米产量对基础地力和施肥的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(2):129-138.
[3]李少昆,赵久然,董树亭,等. 中国玉米栽培研究进展与展望[J].中国农业科学, 2017,50(11):1941-1959.
[4]王怡,赵曼,田体伟,等. 不同玉米品种玉米蚜田间消长与其主要生化物质的相关性研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2016, 50(3): 364-369.
[5]张衍干,黄吉,施伟迪,等. 不同玉米品种对玉米蚜的抗性及 其与瓢虫的联合控害作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(5):815-819.
[6]赵曼,田体伟,李为争,等. 玉米蚜在8个玉米品种(系)上取食行为的比较分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(8):1538-1547.
[7]黄钰淼,董晨晖,柴正群,等. 云南两个不同生态区玉米种群动态研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2015, 37(5):946-954.
[8]李远,赵曼,郭线茹,等. 不同玉米品种(系)田间抗蚜性的初步鉴定[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2012, 46(3):307-312.
[9]宋伟,江俊起,缪勇. 不同玉米品种抗蚜性研究[J]. 生物灾害科学, 2014,37(4):288-292.
[10]王怡,赵曼,田体伟,等. 不同玉米品种玉米蚜田间消长与其主要生化物质的相关性研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2016, 50(3): 364-369.
[11]武德功,袁梦环,王伟,等. 玉米自交系抗蚜性与农艺性状和叶片理化指标的关系[J]. 西北农业学报,2018,27(6):1-10.
[12]熊雪,刘济明,王军才,等. 磷素供给对米槁幼苗光合作用-CO2响应的影响[J].南方农业学报 ,2017,48(11):1983-1988.
[13]肇思迪,娄运生,庞渤,等. UV-B辐射增强下施硅对冬小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2017,33(5):1036-1043.
[14]刘志娟,杨晓光,吕硕,等. 气候变化背景下东北三省春玉米产量潜力的时空特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1):103-112.
[15]马梦茹,王占林,贺康宁,等.不同土壤含水量与光照对山杏和四翅滨藜光合作用的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2017,45(22):126-129.
[16]孟凡超,张佳华,郝翠,等. CO2浓度升高和不同灌溉量对东北玉米光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(7):2126-2135.
[17]施守杰,符云鹏, 杨双剑,等. 遮阴对烤烟上部叶光合特性及品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学,2016,48(2):24-28.
[18]李杨,杨子详,陈晓鸣,等. 角倍蚜虫瘿对盐肤木光合特性和总氮含量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21):6876-6884.
[19]李跃强,宣维健,王红托,等. 棉花对棉铃虫危害超补偿作用的生理机制[J]. 昆虫学报, 2003, 46(3):267-271.
[20]陈建明,俞晓平,程家安,等. 植物耐虫性研究进展[J]. 昆虫学报, 2005,48(2):262-272.
[21]李强,罗延宏,余东海,等. 低氮胁迫对耐低氮玉米品种苗期光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料, 2015, 21(5):1132-1141.
[22]武德功,王俊,张露雨,等. 抗、感玉米幼苗玉米蚜为害后不同时间的生理响应[J]. 江苏农业学报,2018,34(3):493-502.
[23]武德功,方文浩,杜军利,等. 不同蚜虫密度胁迫对抗感玉米幼苗生理物质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报,2018,30(4):528-536.
[24]艾尼玩尔·黑里力,胡守林,万素梅. 喷施页面肥对棉蚜侵害后棉花叶片保护酶活性及光合指标的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018,30(3): 28-32.
[25]卜令铎,张仁和,常宇,等. 苗期玉米叶片光合特性对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(5):1184-1191.
[26]魏孝荣,郝明德,张春霞,等. 土壤干旱条件下外源锌、锰对夏玉米光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(8):1101-1104.
[27]高玉红,牛俊义,徐锐,等. 不同覆盖方式对玉米叶片光合、蒸腾及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(5):178-184.
[28]于文颖,纪瑞鹏,冯锐,等. 不同生育期玉米叶片光合特性及水分利用效率对水分胁迫的相应[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(9):2902-2909.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨长琴,张国伟,刘瑞显,等.氮肥运筹对麦后直播棉光合性能、生物量、氮素累积及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(05):1028.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.011]
 YANG Chang-qin,ZHANG Guo-wei,LIU Rui-xian,et al.Effects of nitrogen management on photosynthesis, biomass, nitrogen accumulation and yield traits of field-seeded cotton after barley harvest[J].,2017,(04):1028.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.011]
[2]武德功,王俊,张露雨,等.抗、感玉米幼苗玉米蚜为害后不同时间的生理响应[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(03):493.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.003]
 WU De-gong,WANG Jun,ZHANG Lu-yu,et al.Physiological response of resistant and susceptible maize seedlings at different time after Rhopalosiphum maidis stress[J].,2018,(04):493.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-05-08 基金项目:安徽省教育厅重点项目(KJ2016A825、KJ2017A513);安徽省级草学学科建设重大项目[皖教秘科(2014)28号];国家自然科学基金项目(31301383、31501271);2018年安徽省高校优秀青年骨干人才国内访问研修项目(gxgnfx2018021);安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划重点项目(gxyqZD2016218);省级大学生创新课题项目(2018S10879029) 作者简介:杜军利(1983-), 女,河北邯郸人,博士,讲师,主要研究方向为植物抗虫性。(E-mail)adu83419@163.com 通讯作者:武德功,(E-mail)wudegong118@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-04