[1]王运儒,秦玉燕,杨秀娟,等.40%氯虫·噻虫嗪水分散粒剂在辣椒及土壤中的残留消解动态[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(01):207-212.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.030]
 WANG Yun-ru,QIN Yu-yan,YANG Xiu-juan,et al.Dissipation of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam in pepper and soil after field application in the form of 40% water dispersible granules[J].,2018,(01):207-212.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.030]
点击复制

40%氯虫·噻虫嗪水分散粒剂在辣椒及土壤中的残留消解动态()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
207-212
栏目:
加工贮藏·质量安全
出版日期:
2018-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dissipation of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam in pepper and soil after field application in the form of 40% water dispersible granules
作者:
王运儒秦玉燕杨秀娟马婧邓有展时鹏涛农耀京陆仲烟吴凤
(广西壮族自治区亚热带作物研究所,农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室<南宁>,农业部亚热带果品蔬菜质量监督检验测试中心,广西南宁530001)
Author(s):
WANG Yun-ruQIN Yu-yanYANG Xiu-juanMA JingDENG You-zhanSHI Peng-taoNONG Yao-jingLU Zhong-yanWU Feng
(Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Laboratory of Quality Risk Assessment for Agro-products<Nanning>, Ministry of Agriculture, Quality Supervision and Testing Center of Subtropical Fruit and Vegetable, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanning 530001, C
关键词:
氯虫苯甲酰胺噻虫嗪超高压液相色谱-串联质谱(UPLC-MS)辣椒残留消解动态
Keywords:
chlorantraniliprolethiamethoxamultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometrypepperresiduedissipation
分类号:
S481.8;TQ450.26
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了明确40%氯虫·噻虫嗪水分散粒剂在辣椒和土壤中的消解动态及残留规律,用乙腈匀浆提取辣椒和土壤样品,经N-丙基乙二胺(PSA)、C18分散固相萃取剂净化,超高压液相色谱-串联质谱测定。结果表明,在辣椒植株和土壤中添加氯虫苯甲酰胺和噻虫嗪 0.020~2.000 mg/kg,其平均回收率为 88.5%~101.1%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为 2.1%~8.3%,氯虫苯甲酰胺和噻虫嗪在辣椒中的定量限(LOQ)均为0.005 mg/kg。田间残留试验结果表明,氯虫苯甲酰胺和噻虫嗪在辣椒及土壤中的残留消解动态均符合一级动力学反应模型。氯虫苯甲酰胺在辣椒和土壤中的半衰期分别为5.0 d 和4.8 d,噻虫嗪在辣椒和土壤中的半衰期分别为6.6 d和4.5 d。按照推荐剂量和1.5倍推荐剂量对辣椒施用40%氯虫·噻虫嗪水分散粒剂,最后一次施药后3.0 d,氯虫苯甲酰胺和噻虫嗪在辣椒中的残留量分别为0.912 mg/kg和0.627 mg/kg,低于欧盟规定氯虫苯甲酰胺和噻虫嗪在辣椒中的最大残留量。
Abstract:
To determine the residue and dissipation of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam in pepper and soil, the samples were extracted by acetonitrile, then cleaned by PSA and C18 in the form of dispersive solid-phase extraction, thereafter, the extract was ready for the analysis of liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. The results showed that the limits of quantification (LOQ) of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam in pepper were both 0.005 mg/kg. For the spiked sample, in the range of 0.020 mg/kg to 2.000 mg/kg, the recoveries of both pesticides reached to 88.5%-101.1% and the relative standard deviation varied from 2.1% to 8.3%. The dissipation of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam in pepper and soil were all fitted in the first-order kinetics equation. The half-lives of chlorantraniliprole in pepper and soil were 5.0 d and 4.8 d, and those of thiamethoxam were 6.6 d and 4.5 d, respectively. For the field trial, the recommended dosage and 1.5 times recommended dosage of 40% chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam water dispersible granules were sprayed two times with three days pre-harvest interval. The results showed that the harvest residues of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam in pepper were 0.912 mg/kg and 0.627 mg/kg, and were below the maximum residue limit provided by European Union.

参考文献/References:

[1]ZHANG J M, CHAI W G, WU Y L. Residues of chlorantraniliprole in rice field ecosystem[J]. Chemosphere, 2012, 87(2): 132-136.
[2]KAR A, MANDAL K, SINGH B. Environmental fate of chlorantraniliprole residues on cauliflower using QuEChERS technique[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2013, 185(2): 1255-1263.
[3]LAHM G P, STEVENSON T M, SELBY T P, et al. RynaxypyrTM: a new insecticidal anthranilic diamide that acts as a potent and selective ryanodine receptor activator[J]. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2007, 17(22): 6274-6279.
[4]吴群,施艳红,操海群,等. 氯虫苯甲酰胺在水溶液中光解的影响因素研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(11):2242-2246.
[5]牛芳,崔新倩,王开运. 小菜蛾对氯虫苯甲酰胺抗性发展趋势及其种群生物适合度代价初步研究[J]. 农药学学报, 2011, 13(5):543-546.
[6]FENOLL J, GARRIDO I, CAVA J, et al. Photometabolic pathways of chlorantraniliprole in aqueous slurries containing binary and ternary oxides of Zn and Ti[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 264: 720-727.
[7]WANG X, XIANG Z, YAN X, et al. Dissipation rate and residual fate of thiamethoxam in tobacco leaves and soil exposed to field treatments[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2013, 91(2): 246-250.
[8]李颖.华南地区辣椒主要病虫害的识别及综合防治[J].广东农业科学, 2006(1): 92-93.
[9]孟海涛,艾连峰,徐牛生. 在线净化液相色谱-串联质谱法测定蔬菜中噻虫嗪和氯虫苯甲酰胺的残留[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(2): 369-371.
[10]徐妍,战瑞,马超,等. 30%噻虫嗪·氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂高效液相色谱分析[J]. 农药, 2009, 48(7):494-495.
[11]陈小军,王萌,范淑琴,等. QuEChERS前处理结合HPLC-MS/MS法分析氯虫苯甲酰胺在甘蓝和土壤中的残留[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(13):2636-2647.
[12]秦冬梅,秦旭,徐应明,等. 土壤和番茄中氯虫苯甲酰胺的残留检测与消解动态研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(5): 858-863.
[13]吴绪金,李萌,张军锋,等. 小麦和土壤中噻虫嗪残留及消解动态分析[J].麦类作物学报,2014,34(7):1010-1017.
[14]梁旭阳,刘新刚,徐军,等. 噻虫嗪在棉花和土壤中的残留动态研究[J]. 植物保护,2013,39(2):101-104.
[15]贺敏,贾春虹,马志宏,等. 土壤中噻虫嗪和氯虫苯甲酰胺的残留分析方法[J]. 农药, 2013(6): 431-433.
[16]刘烨潼,郭永泽,陈秋生,等. 氯虫苯甲酰胺和噻虫嗪在移栽小白菜上的残留趋势[J]. 天津农业科学, 2015, 21(3): 99-104.
[17]张希跃,吴迪,潘洪吉,等.氯虫苯甲酰胺和高效氯氟氰菊酯在豇豆和土壤中的残留行为[J].农药学学报, 2016, 18(4): 481-489.
[18]王东,侯传金,赵尔成,等. 盐析辅助均相液液萃取/分散固相萃取-超高效液相色谱串联质谱法测定蜂蜜中新烟碱类农药残留[J]. 分析测试学报, 2015,34(6): 681-685.
[19]JOVANOV P, GUZSVNY V, FRANKO M, et al. Multi-residue method for determination of selected neonicotinoid insecticides in honey using optimized dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Talanta, 2013, 111: 125-133.
[20]陈国峰,刘峰,张晓波,等. 氯虫苯甲酰胺在大豆和土壤中的残留及降解行为[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(5): 894-900.
[21]邵建果,杨俊柱,王军. 噻虫嗪在小麦中的残留消解动态及风险评估[J]. 农药学学报, 2013, 15(1): 98-102.
[22]李晓亮,秦智伟,候利园,等. 土壤环境因素对残留农药降解的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2009, 40(4): 132-135.
[23]中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,中华人民共和国农业部.食品中农药最大残留限量: GB 2763—2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘景坤,武春媛,贾明明,等.液质联用法测定辣椒中噻虫嗪残留[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):934.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.035]
 LIU Jing-kun,WU Chun-yuan,JIA Ming-ming,et al.A LC-MS method for detection of thiamethoxam residue in pepper[J].,2016,(01):934.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.035]
[2]徐雪凌,李明,李荣玉,等.醚菊酯、噻虫嗪及其混配对贵州三地褐飞虱的毒力及田间防治效果[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(01):56.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.009 ]
 XU Xue-ling,LI Ming,LI Rong-yu,et al.Toxicity of ethofenprox, thiamethoxam and their mixtures on Nilaparvata lugens and the field control effect in Guizhou province[J].,2017,(01):56.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.009 ]
[3]崔凯,葛静,柴阳阳,等.噻虫嗪对水稻内生真菌群落组成的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(04):802.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.04.012]
 CUI Kai,GE Jing,CHAI Yang-yang,et al.Changes of endophytic fungal community in rice plants exposed to thiamethoxam[J].,2017,(01):802.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.04.012]
[4]于居龙,周泳凯,顾浩天,等.氯虫苯甲酰胺拌种处理对不同生育期水稻生化物质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(02):289.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.02.007]
 YU Ju-long,ZHOU Yong-kai,GU Hao-tian,et al.Effects of seed treated with chlorobenzamide on biochemical substances in rice at different growth stages[J].,2019,(01):289.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.02.007]
[5]杨听雨,杨邦保,闫小龙,等.三种农药拌种后在土壤-水稻系统中的迁移和分布[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(02):405.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.02.013]
 YANG Ting-yu,YANG Bang-bao,YAN Xiao-long,et al.Migration and distribution of three pesticides in soil-rice system after seed dressing[J].,2023,(01):405.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.02.013]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-06-28 基金项目:国家蔬菜质量安全风险评估项目(GJFP201700203) 作者简介:王运儒(1986-),男,广西南宁人,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事农产品质量安全检测与风险评估研究。(Tel)18577836959;(E-mail)wangaa2008@163.com 通讯作者:农耀京,(E-mail)2455889212@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-06