[1]李青,李其胜,刘璐,等.双物种植物根际促生菌菌剂的不同应用策略对西瓜生长及根际细菌群落的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2026,42(04):786-797.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.04.015]
 LI Qing,LI Qisheng,LIU Lu,et al.Effects of different application strategies of dual-species plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculants on watermelon growth and rhizosphere bacterial communities[J].,2026,42(04):786-797.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.04.015]
点击复制

双物种植物根际促生菌菌剂的不同应用策略对西瓜生长及根际细菌群落的影响()

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
42
期数:
2026年04期
页码:
786-797
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2026-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different application strategies of dual-species plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculants on watermelon growth and rhizosphere bacterial communities
作者:
李青李其胜刘璐孙玉东赵建锋张苗董青君谢昶琰章安康
(江苏徐淮地区淮阴农业科学研究所,江苏淮安223001)
Author(s):
LI QingLI QishengLIU LuSUN YudongZHAO JianfengZHANG MiaoDONG QingjunXIE ChangyanZHANG Ankang
(Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Sciences of the Xuhuai District of Jiangsu Province, Huai’an 223001, China)
关键词:
生物育苗基质双物种植物根际促生菌菌剂根际细菌群落生物有机肥植物生长促进作用
Keywords:
biological seedling-raising substratedual-species plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculantrhizosphere bacterial communitybio-organic fertilizerplant growth promotion
分类号:
S651.06
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.04.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生物育苗基质、生物有机肥均可以通过其含有的植物根际促生菌(PGPR)来优化根际微生物组,从而促进作物生长。本研究旨在探究在2种施用策略(生物育苗基质和生物有机肥)下,双物种PGPR菌剂对西瓜生长及根际细菌群落的影响,从而为设施农业的发展提供技术支撑。设置如下4个盆栽试验处理:普通育苗基质+普通有机肥(OSOF)、普通育苗基质+生物有机肥(OSBF)、生物育苗基质+普通有机肥(BSOF)、生物育苗基质+生物有机肥(BSBF)。结果表明,与OSOF处理相比,OSBF处理对西瓜生长、根际细菌群落的影响不明显;BSBF处理能改变根际细菌群落的多样性,优化其结构与组成,显著增加西瓜植株株高、地上部生物量和地下部生物量。在BSOF处理下,鞘氨醇单胞菌科(Sphingomonadaceae)等若干潜在有益细菌类群的相对丰度显著提高,或被随机森林模型预测为该处理的关键类群,其中,鞘氨醇单胞菌属(Sphingomonas sp.)是预测西瓜促生效应的重要因子。PICRUSt2功能预测结果显示,与OSOF、OSBF处理相比,BSOF、BSBF处理的辅因子与维生素代谢、其他氨基酸代谢、膜转运及信号转导等相关功能的相对丰度显著提升。综上,在首次施用双物种PGPR菌剂时,应优先选择生物育苗基质策略,能够更高效地优化根际细菌群落结构并促进西瓜生长,并且与生物有机肥联用的效果更佳。
Abstract:
Both biological seedling-raising substrates and biological organic fertilizers can optimize the rhizosphere microbiome through the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) they contain, thereby promoting crop growth. This study aimed to explore the effects of a dual-species PGPR inoculant on watermelon growth and rhizosphere bacterial communities under two application strategies (biological seedling-raising substrates and biological organic fertilizers), so as to provide technical support for the development of facility agriculture. The pot experiment was set up with the following four treatments: ordinary seedling-raising substrate + ordinary organic fertilizer (OSOF), ordinary seedling-raising substrate + biological organic fertilizer (OSBF), biological seedling-raising substrate + ordinary organic fertilizer (BSOF), biological seedling-raising substrate + biological organic fertilizer (BSBF). The results showed that compared with the OSOF treatment, the OSBF treatment had no obvious impact on watermelon growth and rhizosphere bacterial communities. The BSBF treatment altered the diversity of rhizosphere bacterial communities, optimized their structure and composition, and significantly increased the plant height, aboveground biomass, and underground biomass of watermelon plants. Under the BSOF treatment, the relative abundances of several potentially beneficial bacterial taxa, such as Sphingomonadaceae, were significantly increased, or were predicted as key taxa for this treatment by the random forest model. Among them, Sphingomonas sp. was identified as an important factor for predicting the growth-promoting effect on watermelon. The PICRUSt2 functional prediction results revealed that compared with the OSOF and OSBF treatments, the relative abundances of functions such as cofactor and vitamin metabolism, other amino acid metabolism, membrane transport, and signal transduction in the BSOF and BSBF treatments were significantly increased. In conclusion, when applying the dual-species PGPR inoculant for the first time, the biological seedling-raising substrate strategy should be given priority, as it can more efficiently optimize the rhizosphere bacterial community structure and promote watermelon growth, and the effect is even better when combined with biological organic fertilizers.

参考文献/References:

[1]SHAH F, WU W. Soil and crop management strategies to ensure higher crop productivity within sustainable environments[J]. Sustainability,2019,11(5):1485.
[2]ZHANG H Q, ZHENG X Q, WANG X T, et al. Effect of fertilization regimes on continuous cropping growth constraints in waterme-lon is associated with abundance of key ecological clusters in the rhizosphere[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2022,339:108135.
[3]AL-TAMMAR F K, KHALIFA A Z. Plant growth promoting bacteria drive food security[J]. Brazilian Journal of Biology,2022,82:e267257.
[4]DLAMINI S P, AKANMU A O, BABALOLA O O. Rhizospheric microorganisms:the gateway to a sustainable plant health[J]. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems,2022,6:925802.
[5]BERENDSEN R L, PIETERSE C M J, BAKKER P A H M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health[J]. Trends in Plant Science,2012,17(8):478-486.
[6]PHILIPPOT L, RAAIJMAKERS J M, LEMANCEAU P, et al. Going back to the roots:the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology,2013,11(11):789-799.
[7]BAI B, LIU W D, QIU X Y, et al. The root microbiome:community assembly and its contributions to plant fitness[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,2022,64(2):230-243.
[8]PANTIGOSO H A, NEWBERGER D, VIVANCO J M. The rhizosphere microbiome:plant-microbial interactions for resource acquisition[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology,2022,133(5):2864-2876.
[9]NOMAN M, AHMED T, IJAZ U, et al. Plant-microbiome crosstalk:dawning from composition and assembly of microbial community to improvement of disease resilience in plants[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2021,22(13):6852.
[10]SUN X L, XU Z H, XIE J Y, et al. Bacillus velezensis stimulates resident rhizosphere Pseudomonas stutzeri for plant health through metabolic interactions[J]. The ISME Journal,2022,16:774-787.
[11]ZHAO J, LIU J, LIANG H, et al. Manipulation of the rhizosphere microbial community through application of a new bio-organic fertilizer improves watermelon quality and health[J]. PLoS One,2018,13(2):e0192967.
[12]ZHANG Y, GAO X, SHEN Z Z, et al. Pre-colonization of PGPR triggers rhizosphere microbiota succession associated with crop yield enhancement[J]. Plant and Soil,2019,439(1):553-567.
[13]FU L, PENTON C R, RUAN Y Z, et al. Inducing the rhizosphere microbiome by biofertilizer application to suppress banana Fusarium wilt disease[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,104:39-48.
[14]XIONG W, GUO S, JOUSSET A, et al. Bio-fertilizer application induces soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease by reshaping the soil microbiome[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,114:238-247.
[15]TAO C Y, LI R, XIONG W, et al. Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil Pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression[J]. Microbiome,2020,8(1):137.
[16]LI Q S, LI Q, YIN X D, et al. Construction of Bacillus-Pseudomonas synthetic communities and development of bio-nursery substrates[J]. Agronomy,2024,14(9):2179.
[17]李青,谢昶琰,张苗,等. 防控甜瓜枯萎病病菌的生防菌筛选及其根际定殖[J]. 江苏农业学报,2023,39(2):336-343.
[18]ZHAO M L, YUAN J, SHEN Z Z, et al. Predominance of soil vs root effect in rhizosphere microbiota reassembly[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2019,95(10):139.
[19]CALLAHAN B J, MCMURDIE P J, ROSEN M J, et al. DADA2:high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data[J]. Nature Methods,2016,13(7):581-583.
[20]BOKULICH N A, KAEHLER B D, RIDEOUT J R, et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2′s q2-feature-classifier plugin[J]. Microbiome,2018,6(1):90.
[21]QUAST C, PRUESSE E, YILMAZ P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project:improved data processing and web-based tools[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,2013,41:D590-D596.
[22]MCMURDIE P J, HOLMES S. Phyloseq:an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(4):e61217.
[23]BARTER R L, YU B. Superheat:an R package for creating beautiful and extendable heatmaps for visualizing complex data[J]. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics,2018,27(4):910-922.
[24]LIU C, CUI Y M, LI X Z, et al. Microeco:an R package for data mining in microbial community ecology[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2021,97(2):fiaa255.
[25]DOUGLAS G M, MAFFEI V J, ZANEVELD J R, et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions[J]. Nature Biotechnology,2020,38(6):685-688.
[26]GREGORY CAPORASO J, KUCZYNSKI J, STOMBAUGH J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data[J]. Nature Methods,2010,7(5):335-336.
[27]WERNER G D A, TOBY KIERS E. Order of arrival structures arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of plants[J]. The New Phytologist,2015,205(4):1515-1524.
[28]沈婷婷, 张琇, 杨国平, 等. 生防菌剂对西瓜根际土壤微生物群落和尖孢镰刀菌属的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2023,51(7):115-125.
[29]刘红江,郭智,张岳芳,等. 不同类型有机肥对水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2024,40(4):645-651.
[30]刘亚军,胡启国,王文静,等. 生物有机肥以及钙镁硅型土壤调理剂对甘薯连作田土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳含量的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2025,41(1):51-60.
[31]李禹,段斌,杨代云,等. 有机肥配施微生物菌剂对土壤理化特性及烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2025,53(2):81-87.
[32]付锦涛,张香竹,郑煜,等. 化肥减量配施有机肥和灌水量对马铃薯生长、产量及水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2024,52(17):73-79.
[33]SHEN Z Z, WANG D S, RUAN Y Z, et al. Deep 16S rRNA pyrosequencing reveals a bacterial community associated with banana Fusarium Wilt disease suppression induced by bio-organic fertilizer application[J]. PLoS One,2014,9(5):e98420.
[34]SHEN Z Z, WANG B B, ZHU J X, et al. Lime and ammonium carbonate fumigation coupled with bio-organic fertilizer application steered banana rhizosphere to assemble a unique microbiome against Panama disease[J]. Microbial Biotechnology,2019,12(3):515-527.
[35]YE L, ZHAO X, BAO E C, et al. Bio-organic fertilizer with reduced rates of chemical fertilization improves soil fertility and enhances tomato yield and quality[J]. Scientific Reports,2020,10(1):177.
[36]YOUSEIF S H. Genetic diversity of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their effects on the growth of maize plants under greenhouse conditions[J]. Annals of Agricultural Sciences,2018,63(1):25-35.
[37]ELSHAFIE H S, CAMELE I. An overview of metabolic activity,beneficial and pathogenic aspects of Burkholderia spp[J]. Metabolites,2021,11(5):321.
[38]PAL G, SAXENA S, KUMAR K, et al. Endophytic Burkholderia:multifunctional roles in plant growth promotion and stress tolerance[J]. Microbiological Research,2022,265:127201.
[39]MA T F, XUE H, PIAO C G, et al. Phylogenomic reappraisal of the family Rhizobiaceae at the genus and species levels,including the description of Ectorhizobium quercum gen.nov.,sp.nov[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2023,14:1207256.
[40]WANG F, WEI Y L, YAN T Z, et al. Sphingomonas sp.Hbc-6 alters physiological metabolism and recruits beneficial rhizosphere bacteria to improve plant growth and drought tolerance[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2022,13:1002772.
[41]WANG J L, LIU K L, ZHAO X Q, et al. Microbial keystone taxa drive crop productivity through shifting aboveground-belowground mineral element flows[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2022,811:152342.
[42]WANG S J, DUAN S L, GEORGE T S, et al. Adding plant metabolites improve plant phosphorus uptake by altering the rhizosphere bacterial community structure[J]. Plant and Soil,2024,497(1):503-522.
[43]TURNER T R, RAMAKRISHNAN K, WALSHAW J, et al. Comparative metatranscriptomics reveals Kingdom level changes in the rhizosphere microbiome of plants[J]. The ISME Journal,2013,7(12):2248-2258.
[44]LI H Y, LOU J, CHEN X L, et al. Effects of sweet pepper straw biochar on soil microbial communities and growth of continuously cropped cucumber[J]. Annals of Microbiology,2024,74(1):12.
[45]TANAKA T. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis two-component regulation[J]. Frontiers in Bioscience,2002,7(4):d1815-d1824.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2025-06-19基金项目:淮安市自然科学研究计划项目(HAB2024077);江苏省水利科技项目(2023056)作者简介:李青(1990-),女,河南洛阳人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事土壤微生物与生物肥料研究。(E-mail)l2013203049@163.com。李其胜为共同第一作者。通讯作者:谢昶琰,(E-mail)15295590157@163.com;章安康,(E-mail)13905239366@139.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-05-11