[1]孙慧雯,夏玉莹,王进,等.胺鲜酯与油菜素内酯复配对绿豆生长及产量和品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2026,42(04):718-726.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.04.008]
　SUN Huiwen,XIA Yuying,WANG Jin,et al.Effects of combined application of diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate and brassinolide on growth, yield and quality of mung bean[J].,2026,42(04):718-726.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.04.008]
点击复制

胺鲜酯与油菜素内酯复配对绿豆生长及产量和品质的影响()

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
42
期数:
2026年04期
页码:
718-726
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2026-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of combined application of diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate and brassinolide on growth, yield and quality of mung bean
作者:
孙慧雯1; 2; 夏玉莹1; 2; 王进1; 2; 杨坤3; 项宏飞1; 2; 王庆燕1; 2; 姜海鹏1; 2; 方淑梅2; 4; 梁喜龙1; 2
(1.黑龙江八一农垦大学农学院,黑龙江大庆163319;2.黑龙江省植物生长调节剂工程技术研究中心,黑龙江大庆163319；3.黑龙江省北大荒集团和平牧场,黑龙江大庆163851；4.黑龙江八一农垦大学生命科学技术学院,黑龙江大庆163319)
Author(s):
SUN Huiwen1; 2; XIA Yuying1; 2; WANG Jin1; 2; YANG Kun3; XIANG Hongfei1; 2; WANG Qingyan1; 2; JIANG Haipeng1; 2; FANG Shumei2; 4; LIANG Xilong1; 2
(1.College of Agriculture, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China;2.Heilongjiang Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Plant Growth Regulators, Daqing 163319, China;3.Heilongjiang Beidahuang Group Peace Ranch, Daqing 163851, China;4.College of Life Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China)
关键词:
绿豆; 胺鲜酯; 油菜素内酯; 农艺性状; 产量; 品质
Keywords:
mung bean; diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate; brassinolide; agronomic traits; yield; quality
分类号:
S522
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.04.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
本研究以冀绿2号绿豆为供试品种,采用田间随机区组设计,在盛花期叶面喷施不同质量浓度的胺鲜酯(DA-6)与油菜素内酯(BR)复配药剂,分析其对绿豆农艺性状、产量及品质指标的影响。结果表明,喷施不同质量浓度胺鲜酯与油菜素内酯复配药剂可不同程度地改善绿豆生长、产量和品质。其中25.00 mg/L胺鲜酯＋0.08 mg/L油菜素内酯处理效果最佳,2024年和2025年,该处理的产量均显著高于对照(P＜0.05)。增产原因在于,该处理显著提高了绿豆的茎粗、分枝数及各器官干物质重,同时促进了单株粒数、荚数和粒重的协同提升。相关性分析结果表明，产量与主茎荚数呈显著正相关(P＜0.05),与茎粗、单株荚数、单株粒重和分枝荚数呈极显著正相关(P＜0.01)。本研究结果为绿豆田间生产的产量与品质调控提供了重要参考。
Abstract:
In this study, Jilü 2 mung bean was used as the test variety. A randomized block field design was adopted, and different mass concentrations of diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate (DA-6) and brassinolide (BR) compound were foliarly sprayed at the full-bloom stage. The effects on agronomic traits, yield and quality indices of mung bean were analyzed. The results showed that foliar application of the DA-6 and BR compound at different mass concentrations improved the growth, yield and quality of mung bean to varying degrees. Among them, the treatment of 25.00 mg/L diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate + 0.08 mg/L brassinolide showed the best effect. In 2024 and 2025, the yield under this treatment was significantly higher than that of the control (P＜0.05). The yield increase was attributed to the fact that this treatment significantly improved stem diameter, branch number and dry matter weight of various organs in mung bean, and simultaneously promoted the synergistic increase in seed number per plant, pod number per plant and seed weight per plant. Correlation analysis indicated that yield was significantly positively correlated with pods per main stem (P＜0.05), and was extremely significantly positively correlated with stem diameter, pods per plant, grain weight per plant and pods per branch (P＜0.01). The results of this study provide an important reference for the regulation of yield and quality in mung bean field production.

参考文献/References:

[1]王通宇,方淑梅,王庆燕,等. 叶面喷施不同化控复配剂对大豆产量与品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学,2023,42(1):70-76.
[2]宫香伟,刘春娟,冯乃杰,等. S3307和DTA-6对大豆不同冠层叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 植物生理学报,2017,53(10):1867-1876.
[3]杨修一,李圣会,梅宇超,等. DA-6对水培生菜生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2017,36(1):32-38.
[4]郝青南,汪嫒嫒,龙泽福,等. DA-6对南方大豆品种性状、产量和品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学,2021,40(6):799-804.
[5]LIU C J, FENG N J, ZHENG D F, et al. Uniconazole and diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate increase soybean pod setting and yield by regulating sucrose and starch content[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2019,99(2):748-758.
[6]肖瑞雪,郭丽丽,贾琦石,等. 油菜素内酯调控植物生长发育及产量品质研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学,2019,47(10):16-21.
[7]谢云灿,何孝磊,杜鹏,等. 外源油菜素内酯对高温胁迫下大豆光合特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学,2017,36(2):237-243.
[8]田静,程须珍,范保杰,等. 我国绿豆品种现状及发展趋势[J]. 作物杂志,2021(6):15-21.
[9]钱静斐,张蕙杰. 中国食用豆贸易演变特征及现状分析[J]. 中国食物与营养,2021,27(2):20-25.
[10]王丽侠,程须珍,王素华. 绿豆种质资源、育种及遗传研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学,2009,42(5):1519-1527.
[11]刘襄河,郑丽璇,郑丽勉,等. 双波长法测定常用淀粉原料中直链淀粉、支链淀粉及总淀粉含量[J]. 广东农业科学,2013,40(18):97-100.
[12]中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会， 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中脂肪的测定:GB 5009.6-2016[S]. 北京：中国标准出版社,2016.
[13]全国粮油标准化技术委员会. 谷物和豆类氮含量测定和粗蛋白质含量计算凯氏法:GB/T 5511-2008[S]. 中国标准出版社,2008.
[14]赵黎明,段绍彪,项洪涛,等. 干湿交替灌溉与植物生长调节剂对水稻光合特性及内源激素的影响[J]. 作物学报,2025,51(1):174-188.
[15]谢章书,谢学方,屠小菊,等. 植物激素对棉花蕾铃脱落的调控研究进展[J]. 作物学报,2025,51(1):1-29.
[16]樊海潮,顾万荣,杨德光,等. 化控剂对东北春玉米茎秆理化特性及抗倒伏的影响[J]. 作物学报,2018,44(6):909-919.
[17]王娜,杨思敏,刘蓓蓓,等. 植物生长调节剂对绿豆干物质积累动态与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2021,26(3):10-17.
[18]郑殿峰,赵黎明,于洋,等. 植物生长调节剂对大豆花荚脱落及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学,2008,27(5):783-786.
[19]刘洋. 烯效唑和激动素对绿豆根系建成与生长发育及产量的影响[D]. 大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2016.
[20]DEHGHAN M, BALOUCHI H, YADAVI A, et al. Improve wheat(Triticum aestivum) performance by brassinolide application under different irrigation regimes[J]. South African Journal of Botany,2020,130:259-267.
[21]HUANG G M, LIU Y G, GUO Y L, et al. A novel plant growth regulator improves the grain yield of high-density maize crops by reducing stalk lodging and promoting a compact plant type[J]. Field Crops Research,2021,260:107982.
[22]GONG L S, QU S J, HUANG G M, et al. Improving maize grain yield by formulating plant growth regulator strategies in North China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2021,20:622-632.
[23]丁凯鑫,冯乃杰,郑殿峰,等. 植物生长调节剂对赤豆鼓粒期光合特性及氮代谢的影响[J]. 核农学报,2022,36(12):2510-2518.
[24]潘彬荣,岳高红,刘永安,等. 胺鲜酯对甜玉米叶片光合特征、籽粒糖分积累和产量的调控效应[J]. 农药学学报,2015,17(6):660-666.
[25]ZHANG Q, ZHANG L,EVERS J, et al. Maize yield and quality in response to plant density and application of a novel plant growth regulator[J]. Field Crops Research,2014,164:82-89.
[26]RAZA M H, SADOZAI G U, BALOCH M S, et al. Effect of irrigation levels on growth and yield of mungbean[J]. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition,2012,11(10):974-977.
[27]李晓鹏,肖瑞雪,张利霞,等. 叶面喷施胺鲜酯及其与油菜素内酯复配液对油用牡丹生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学,2024,56(1):97-104.
[28]胡标林,万勇,李霞,等. 水稻核心种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报,2012,38(5):829-839.
[29]代攀虹,孙君灵,何守朴,等. 陆地棉核心种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学,2016,49(19):3694-3708.
[30]孙东雷,卞能飞,陈志德,等. 花生种质资源表型性状的综合评价及指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2018,19(5):865-874.
[31]侯小峰,刘静,王彩萍,等. 绿豆产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联分析[J]. 作物杂志,2015(1):53-56.
[32]刘佩瑶,冉莉萍,杨佳庆,等. 小麦穗形态建成和生理特征及外界影响因素的研究进展[J]. 作物杂志,2025(1):1-9.
[33]张旭丽. 绿豆主要农艺性状与产量的相关性和通径分析[J]. 安徽农学通报,2020,26(24):65-67.
[34]杨芳,杨媛,冯高,等. 绿豆籽粒产量与主要农艺性状的相关分析[J]. 农业科技通讯,2012(7):95-97.

相似文献/References:

[1]李阳,袁娜,刘大亮,等.绿豆Copia类反转座子全基因组注释及进化分析[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(04):858.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.008]
　LI Yang,YUAN Na,LIU Da-liang,et al.Annotation and evolutionary analysis of the Copia retrotransposons in mung bean[J].,2020,(04):858.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.008]
[2]李灵慧,吴然然,陈景斌,等.基于PARMS技术的绿豆抗叶斑病基因VrTAF5分子标记的开发[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(06):1386.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.004]
　LI Ling-hui,WU Ran-ran,CHEN Jing-bin,et al.Development of molecular markers of mung bean leaf spot disease resistance gene VrTAF5 based on PARMS technology[J].,2021,(04):1386.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.004]
[3]周旭旭,刘金洋,陈新,等.绿豆Alfin1-like基因家族的鉴定与干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1179.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.004]
　ZHOU Xu-xu,LIU Jin-yang,CHEN Xin,et al.Identification of Alfin1-like gene family in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek and its expression analysis under drought stress[J].,2022,38(04):1179.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.004]
[4]刘金洋,林云,陈景斌,等.绿豆C3H和NBS转录因子家族成员鉴定及盐胁迫响应分析[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(05):1097.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.05.002]
　LIU Jin-yang,LIN Yun,CHEN Jing-bin,et al.Identification and salt stress response analysis of mungbean C3H and NBS transcription factor family members[J].,2023,(04):1097.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.05.002]
[5]叶卫军,吴泽江,田东丰,等.绿豆窄叶突变体vrnl9基因的精细定位与转录组分析[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(02):203.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.02.002]
　YE Wei-jun,WU Ze-jiang,TIAN Dong-feng,et al.Fine mapping and transcriptome analysis of a narrow leaf mutant gene vrnl9 in mungbean[J].,2024,(04):203.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.02.002]
[6]蒋东山,刘金洋,张浩淼,等.基于CNN和Transformer的绿豆干旱胁迫识别模型[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(01):87.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.01.011]
　JIANG Dongshan,LIU Jinyang,ZHANG Haomiao,et al.Drought stress recognition model of mung bean based on CNN and Transformer[J].,2025,(04):87.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.01.011]
[7]闫强,刘欢,王瑞敏,等.绿豆腐霉根腐病抗性鉴定技术体系构建及抗病资源筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(03):510.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.03.010]
　YAN Qiang,LIU Huan,WANG Ruimin,et al.Establishment of resistance identification technology system for mung bean Pythium myriotylum root rot and screening of resistant resources[J].,2025,(04):510.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.03.010]
[8]李洁,宋子微,韩倩,等.耐旱促生复合菌群的构建及其对干旱胁迫下作物的促生作用[J].江苏农业学报,2026,42(02):314.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.02.010]
　LI Jie,SONG Ziwei,HAN Qian,et al.Construction of drought-tolerant and growth-promoting microbial communities and their growth-promoting effects on crops under drought stress[J].,2026,42(04):314.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.02.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2025-08-20基金项目：国家自然科学基金面上项目(32472238、32272225)；黑龙江省农垦总局科技攻关项目(HNK135-02-10)；黑龙江省杂粮产业技术协同创新推广体系项目作者简介：孙慧雯(2001-),女,黑龙江哈尔滨人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物化学控制原理与技术。(E-mail)1711491594@qq.com通讯作者：梁喜龙,(E-mail)xilongliang@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-05-11